|
![]() |
#11 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Schomberg, ON, Canada
Posts: 1,222
Likes: 1,606
Liked 364 Times in 138 Posts
|
![]()
The way I see it, the NHRA has shown the former IHRA specific classes about as much love as they intend to share. Future growth, if indeed the Stock/SS category is perceived to be one with enduring popularity, will be found in the late model entries and corresponding updates to the list of eligible combinations in the Guide.
![]()
__________________
Dave Turner SS/GT #1153 |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#12 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 213
Likes: 379
Liked 56 Times in 31 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
The NHRA is in business to make money. As such, what the future holds for us, is anyone's guess. I do know that a late model Stocker is not in my budget.
__________________
Thomas NHRA 1959 D/SA |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#13 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ancaster ON Canada
Posts: 13
Likes: 3
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
|
![]()
Thank you all; including Too Tall! We ran a stock car for 3 seasons before returning to stock eliminator. We got spoiled running a crate engine; if it was not for the crate class, there probably would not be any stock car racing in Ontario. They are cheap to buy, bullet proof (at 6200 rpm limit) & last forever. Built engines are getting rare. Now mind you, ours are sealed. Thank God for CanAm! I was at the first one at St. Thomas in 1991; it was a blast!
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
|
|