|
![]() |
#11 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Soft combo's love to bitch
__________________
Dusty Lowell 1773 F/SA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Duncannon, PA
Posts: 823
Likes: 133
Liked 512 Times in 84 Posts
|
![]()
I vote for having AHFS at divisionals! Len, I'm sure you'll get a lot more support for this than you think!!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Whittier, Ca
Posts: 830
Likes: 94
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
I vote no for AHFS at divisional
__________________
Tony Janes 7941 STK, SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,855
Likes: 83
Liked 444 Times in 145 Posts
|
![]()
Len, a well known engine builder says you that you told him you were going to post the 1.15 under at opens and divisionals information this week except Wesley told a few people and now you are accepting emails about the subject. True or false?
The AHFS is full of changes that were never given advance notice or publication and with a record like that you have the nerve to come out here and run me down for misguided assumptions. You better wipe that fog from the mirror. Sounds like you aren't too happy about us getting the word out.
__________________
Bruce Noland 1788 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 40
Likes: 1
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
False.
Any possible changes that could or would happen to the AHFS will be put up on the NHRA website, for review by all racers, before a final decision is made to implement any such changes.
__________________
Len Imbrogno |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,855
Likes: 83
Liked 444 Times in 145 Posts
|
![]()
Len,
You say you never told an engine builder that you were going to make the -1.15 change??? So why are you now accepting emails on a subject that the majority of the racers are not in favor of? Why bring the subject up after it had already been decided by the racers???? Your words. And please tell me how we got all those changes in the AHFS when nobody else on the planet has seen them published in advance on any nhra site? Dusty, did you say something about soft combinations? I believe you ran -1.40 this year in Jr. Stock. And that by the way is where most of the fast cars will go at Opens if these guys pull this off.
__________________
Bruce Noland 1788 STK Last edited by Bruce Noland; 11-27-2007 at 06:23 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: southern maine
Posts: 383
Likes: 162
Liked 64 Times in 14 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Could you please explain why you feel this way??
__________________
Mark Callanan 1027 STK |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
I would have to say, NO to 1.15.
__________________
Dusty Lowell 1773 F/SA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Bryan
The way the AHFS would work at Div races is: If you are in the top 10 on the qualifing sheet and are -1.15 you get dinged, (if you are #11 and -1.20 I guess it doen't matter?)the same as -1.15 at a National. Why in the hell would a guy like you with one of the softer combo's vote for that? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
All runs should count. divisionals,nationals,class records,class runoffs, whatever. Thats the only way to determine what the combinations are capable of. It is a performanced based class afterall. I would like to see it go back to running off the record with no breakout and no shoe polish but with all the bracket racers involved now it will never happen.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|