HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-22-2016, 11:17 AM   #221
Mickey Whaley
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,220
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: A case for Tru-Start

Quote:
Originally Posted by bruce noland View Post
mickey, cut these dopes loose! Most of them aren't racers so don't waste your time.
crap
Mickey Whaley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2016, 11:43 AM   #222
Dan Fletcher
Sponsor
 
Dan Fletcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Churchville, NY
Posts: 493
Likes: 129
Liked 1,045 Times in 70 Posts
Cool Re: A case for Tru-Start

I feel in an effort to level the playing field one should only be allowed to edit 9 out of every 10 posts...
__________________
Dan Fletcher 1781 STK, SS, COMP, SG, SC

DAN FLETCHER TRAILER SALES

Dan Fletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2016, 11:53 AM   #223
Mickey Whaley
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,220
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: A case for Tru-Start

got snow yet
Mickey Whaley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2016, 11:55 AM   #224
jmcarter
VIP Member
 
jmcarter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Richmond Hill GA (and Port Ludlow WA)
Posts: 4,299
Likes: 2,393
Liked 3,194 Times in 975 Posts
Default Re: A case for Tru-Start

Time for a classic, dead horse strategies...about as pertinent as most of the posts here and you may enjoy...

1. Buying a stronger whip.

2. Changing riders.

3. Threatening the horse with termination.

4. Appointing a committee to study the horse.

5. Visiting other sites to see how others ride dead horses.

6. Lowering the standards so that dead horses can be included.

7. Re-classifying the dead horse as “living, impaired”.

8. Hiring outside contractors to ride the dead horse.

9. Harnessing several dead horses together to increase the speed.

10. Attempting to mount multiple dead horses in hopes that one of them will spring to life.

11. Providing additional funding and/or training to increase the dead horse’s performance.

12. Doing a productivity study to see if lighter riders would improve the dead horse’s performance.

13. Declaring that as the dead horse does not have to be fed, it is less costly, carries lower overhead, and therefore contributes substantially more to the bottom line of the economy than do some other horses.

14. Re-writing the expected performance requirements for all horses.

15. Promoting the dead horse to a supervisory position
__________________
Jim Carter
2340 Super Stock
2340 SST/2340 Stock
Set another place at the table
jmcarter is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2016, 11:59 AM   #225
Mickey Whaley
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,220
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: A case for Tru-Start

Good Luck
Mickey Whaley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2016, 12:52 PM   #226
HR9121
Live Reporter
 
HR9121's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New Bern, NC
Posts: 3,467
Likes: 146
Liked 3,363 Times in 731 Posts
Default Re: A case for Tru-Start

Mickey, it's time to move on brother! Nothing else to see here, me and the boys are getting worried about you......

PS I hit the edit button for Fletcher!
__________________
James Williamson
W200 J/SA. SS/JA

Last edited by HR9121; 11-22-2016 at 12:54 PM. Reason: Very bored today!
HR9121 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2016, 01:05 PM   #227
HandOverFist
VIP Member
 
HandOverFist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Gulf Breeze, FL
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 8
Liked 33 Times in 16 Posts
Default Re: A case for Tru-Start

__________________
Rich Taylor
I/SA - 321
HandOverFist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2016, 01:06 PM   #228
Ed Carpenter
Live Reporter
 
Ed Carpenter's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Dripping Springs, Tx
Posts: 2,709
Likes: 186
Liked 520 Times in 132 Posts
Default Re: A case for Tru-Start

It will either happen or it won't. Either way all of us will continue to show up. Makes no difference.
__________________
Ed Carpenter
2005 Chevy Cobalt A/SM
Race Engine Development
Ed Carpenter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2016, 01:10 PM   #229
Ed Carpenter
Live Reporter
 
Ed Carpenter's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Dripping Springs, Tx
Posts: 2,709
Likes: 186
Liked 520 Times in 132 Posts
Default Re: A case for Tru-Start

Peter Biondo post.

I am obviously for TruSTART and I AM typically the faster car/ chaser.

There will always be the finish line (chaser) advantage to being the faster car and that reason alone is incentive enough for me to continue being the faster car. I don't think anyone would argue that point regardless of if you are running Stock, Top Sportsman, or a Bracket car.

TruSTART simply fixes one starting line system deficiency (in a handicapped scenario) and will lead to long term health of the sport (along the same lines on when it made the sport healthier when we separated door cars and dragsters in our first Spring Fling). Over the past 7 years, I watched the bracket race market change for the better in front of my own eyes and the door car separation had alot to do with that. Encouraging (not discouraging) lower budget participation.

Kyle and I (and Compulink) had alot to lose when we introduced this new concept at our Spring Fling races in 2016 as we were now mixing in a new/ different concept with an already successful race. It was a race where we didn't need more cars; there was very little upside from that perspective versus the downside risk involved.

The bottom line was that we believed in it (along with believing in Brockmeyer from Compulink) enough to take that risk and the racers LOVED IT. I am not talking keyboard racers or "on paper"... I am talking real life racers who actually raced with it.

It is already being installed in tracks throughout the country and similar to cross-talk and auto-start, I believe it will spread and I really hope it does. But if for some reason it doesn't, I am perfectly fine in doing it at our Spring Fling events because its something I believe in.

With this being said, everyone is obviously entitled to their opinion and alot of good points have been made on both sides. If an overall vote was taken (in all classes including the Summit Bracket Race Series), I believe it would be 70% for Tru-START. More importantly, if racers raced on it for 3 or 4 days in a row and then voted on it, I believe the vote would be at least 80% for Tru-START.

Peter Biondo

__________________
Peter Biondo S/Pro 1136 SS1136 Stock 1136
Biondo Racing Products
__________________
Ed Carpenter
2005 Chevy Cobalt A/SM
Race Engine Development
Ed Carpenter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2016, 06:07 PM   #230
Dave Noll
Senior Member
 
Dave Noll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Div. 6, Eastern, WA
Posts: 710
Likes: 2,677
Liked 240 Times in 112 Posts
Default Re: A case for Tru-Start

Thank You Peter
__________________
Dave Noll, EF/S ,?/SA 6526
Dave Noll is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.