HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 08-27-2012, 08:10 PM   #1
LNorton
Senior Member
 
LNorton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: RacerTees.com
Posts: 505
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Default Open Field or Not?

I was unable to attend the MIR ProAm event due to some conflicts. Just got the email today about D1 racers that attended MIR are able to claim their last 2 in-division points races at Darlington or London, but those racers that did not go through tech at MIR cannot claim Darlington or London as their last 2 in-division races.

I spoke with Scooter Peaco and just as the email stated I am told that I cannot claim Darlington as my last 2 in-division races that I need to get my in-division total up to 4. The big problem I have with this decision is that Scooter also told me that if the event had been rescheduled at MIR that I would have been able to attend the reschedule and get my last two division claims as the fields would have been open. He went on telling me how it is not fair to the other 160 racers that attended MIR to allow me to claim Darlington as my last two divisision 1 races.

My question is: How is it any different that I claim Darlington as my last two division 1 races than it would be if the race were to attend the rescheduled at MIR?
__________________
Lee Norton - N229 STK
IHRA H/FIA - NHRA O/SA
RacerTees.com
LNorton is offline   Reply With Quote
 



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.