HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-13-2016, 07:25 PM   #1
Spectre
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Default My take on Tulsa

I was going to tag this to the “Live from Tulsa” thread, but decided this was too important to get buried.

First, I too agree that Cliff and crew did an excellent job keeping up with the starting line. In Div 4 we get that kind of starting line whether the track temperature is 60 or 145 degrees.

Now the reason for the thread.

I strongly disagree with the decision to run the race to competition until 3 am Sunday. The schedule was changed due to a chance of summer thunderstorms during a three hour period on Sunday. I spoke with many drivers who were complaining about the late hour and being “dog *** tired” but still racing. This is UNSAFE!

I don’t believe racing until 3 am “just in case it rains a bit” on Sunday promotes safety for the drivers, crew, or race track personal after a long day of racing in the sun and 90+ degree heat. If there was concern about the Sunday thunder storms, we should have started Saturday at 8 am instead of 10 am. I understand the track losing power for 5 hours didn’t help this situation, but still no excuse for conducting a race into the wee hours of the morning in light of an ever changing forecast.

We as racers rely on and PAY for NHRA to provide us a safe environment for racing. How safe is it to have a Top Dragster/Sportsman going low 6’s at 200+ miles an hour after being up 18+ hours in 90+ degree weather. How safe is it for us to rely on track workers/rescue/EMT personnel who have been working for 18+ hours in the heat. Thank God there was no accident!
If Sunday looked like a total wash out, I could understand the need to race late on Saturday, but not until 3 am Sunday morning.

Earlier in the year, the decision was made on Wednesday before the Dallas divisional to run the entire race on Saturday after seeing the Sunday rain chance. As the week progressed, the rain chance diminished, but NHRA did not revisit this decision, and still tried to finish the race on Saturday. The only reason the race was called on Saturday was due to the temperature dew point spread.

I feel NHRA values saving money and getting home early over our safety. I am not sure it’s understood the money/time invested and the passion we all have to race. Is it too much to ask we be given the best and safest conditions to pursue our dreams of taking home a Wally?

And BTW, no rain at Tulsa on Sunday!

Flame On!
Spectre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2016, 08:30 PM   #2
Ed Wright
Veteran Member
 
Ed Wright's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
Default Re: My take on Tulsa

I started to just go home when I learned we were racing at night. Some of us old guys using blinders have trouble racing in the dark. I should have just gone on home. Gave Cooter round 2. Don't see lights like mine that round everyday. Should have at least made him work a little for it. LOL
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA
Ed Wright is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2016, 11:01 PM   #3
63corvette
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Canyon, Tx
Posts: 551
Likes: 127
Liked 353 Times in 102 Posts
Default Re: My take on Tulsa

I did not like the 3 AM final rounds at all. I am to old for that.
I lost first round but help another racer who runs SC and Top Sportsman.
We ran in the final in TS with a time slip that said 2:38 AM and the track was fine but we were dead tired and dead late thus loosing in the final.
We lost 4th round in the SC car. It was so much of a round robin between the two cars we agreed on a throttle stop setting but then failed to put the numbers in the timer. That again was the being rushed and tired. A silly mistake.
I now remember why I have skipped this race in the past.
I will not soon forget this one.
Rick Cates
63corvette is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2016, 12:01 AM   #4
Cotten
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 235
Likes: 484
Liked 561 Times in 70 Posts
Default Re: My take on Tulsa

I could not agree more. Well said.
Cotten is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2016, 12:32 AM   #5
Ed Carpenter
Live Reporter
 
Ed Carpenter's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Dripping Springs, Tx
Posts: 2,709
Likes: 186
Liked 520 Times in 132 Posts
Default Re: My take on Tulsa

Stupid..........
__________________
Ed Carpenter
2005 Chevy Cobalt A/SM
Race Engine Development
Ed Carpenter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2016, 10:40 AM   #6
sammy pizzolato
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: houma louisiana
Posts: 432
Likes: 52
Liked 56 Times in 13 Posts
Send a message via AIM to sammy pizzolato
Default Re: My take on Tulsa

Well Said Sir !!!!!!!!!!!!
sammy pizzolato is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2016, 11:40 AM   #7
dragracer2011
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: My take on Tulsa

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spectre View Post
I was going to tag this to the “Live from Tulsa” thread, but decided this was too important to get buried.

First, I too agree that Cliff and crew did an excellent job keeping up with the starting line. In Div 4 we get that kind of starting line whether the track temperature is 60 or 145 degrees.

Now the reason for the thread.

I strongly disagree with the decision to run the race to competition until 3 am Sunday. The schedule was changed due to a chance of summer thunderstorms during a three hour period on Sunday. I spoke with many drivers who were complaining about the late hour and being “dog *** tired” but still racing. This is UNSAFE!

I don’t believe racing until 3 am “just in case it rains a bit” on Sunday promotes safety for the drivers, crew, or race track personal after a long day of racing in the sun and 90+ degree heat. If there was concern about the Sunday thunder storms, we should have started Saturday at 8 am instead of 10 am. I understand the track losing power for 5 hours didn’t help this situation, but still no excuse for conducting a race into the wee hours of the morning in light of an ever changing forecast.

We as racers rely on and PAY for NHRA to provide us a safe environment for racing. How safe is it to have a Top Dragster/Sportsman going low 6’s at 200+ miles an hour after being up 18+ hours in 90+ degree weather. How safe is it for us to rely on track workers/rescue/EMT personnel who have been working for 18+ hours in the heat. Thank God there was no accident!
If Sunday looked like a total wash out, I could understand the need to race late on Saturday, but not until 3 am Sunday morning.

Earlier in the year, the decision was made on Wednesday before the Dallas divisional to run the entire race on Saturday after seeing the Sunday rain chance. As the week progressed, the rain chance diminished, but NHRA did not revisit this decision, and still tried to finish the race on Saturday. The only reason the race was called on Saturday was due to the temperature dew point spread.

I feel NHRA values saving money and getting home early over our safety. I am not sure it’s understood the money/time invested and the passion we all have to race. Is it too much to ask we be given the best and safest conditions to pursue our dreams of taking home a Wally?

And BTW, no rain at Tulsa on Sunday!

Flame On!



Well said, X2
dragracer2011 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2016, 11:50 AM   #8
supergas4
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Default Re: My take on Tulsa

our director is starting to act like the last one.
supergas4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2016, 03:27 PM   #9
voltdr
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 706
Likes: 77
Liked 100 Times in 51 Posts
Default Re: My take on Tulsa

I have said the same thing about finishing races late into the night or next morning. It isn't a safe condition. EVERYONE is tired, reaction times (for EVERYONE, inculding safety personnel) are diminished. Fortunately there wasn't an incident. I suggest all concerned people to contact Trey Capps (tcapps@nhra.com) or Graham Light (glight@nhra.com) at NHRA and let their concerns be heard.I have forwarded a link to D4 for Trey to read. Trying to complete a race on schedule should NOT be the priority of the officials that are supposed to have our safety at the fore front.
Dan Foley
SC4698
voltdr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2016, 03:46 PM   #10
supergas4
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Default Re: My take on Tulsa

well said dan.
supergas4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.