HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-02-2007, 01:56 PM   #31
1320GURU
Junior Member
 
1320GURU's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: What about STOCK ?

How about getting rid of the "secret" timers inside of the MSD and transmissions? A spec MSD would do more to level the field than anything else.
1320GURU is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2007, 02:10 PM   #32
stockracer
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: What about STOCK ?

Griffith...Great Idea, really, lets go pro tree! Stick guys can feel like pro stock racers...And bring back deepstaging. Really if a driver is any good all you look at is the bottom bulb and react. Unless you anticipate, which is very inconsistant. I would LOVE to see a pro tree! Bring back deep staging for the slower cars...every body wins! And the adjustability will always be better with a faster car button or no button...

Mr. Beard...When I made my first post I really expected that you would be the first on to get on here and completly rip me, But thank you for speaking your opinion in a decent way. I realize everyone has a different opinion and I just consider this constructive critisim for the class.
stockracer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2007, 02:39 PM   #33
tgriffith
Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: What about STOCK ?

pro tree??? its already here,,,just most of stock dont have a clue
tgriffith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2007, 03:58 PM   #34
Casey Miles
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 705
Likes: 128
Liked 502 Times in 91 Posts
Default Re: What about STOCK ?

Back in the day, there was a track called New York National, they had a get ready light then, one amber then green. The big hitters were Sam Biondo and Phil Montief along with a small group of others. They knew to deep stage before anyone else thought about it. This was before reation timers and 60' clocks. You could always find either of them in the final. So, deep staging wouldn't be a bad idea with a pro tree.
The racer thinking out of the box would still be winning! I beleive that Sam Biondo was one of the racers thinking out of the box and now I think that Peter is following in his footsteps. Peter will still win his share of races, but it would even up the playing field. The faster car would be at a disadvantage with full blinders and pro tree. We had a race at Moroso, the Super pro cars were allowed to use their delay boxes, none of them could hit the tree because of the distraction of the other car leaving.
Casey Miles
248H
Casey Miles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2007, 10:27 AM   #35
Sam Murray
Member
 
Sam Murray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Cummaquid, Mass
Posts: 445
Likes: 413
Liked 60 Times in 29 Posts
Default Re: What about STOCK ?

Instead of everyone complaining here, send a note to Len directly, that you don't want buttons in stock PERIOD. A written letter is better. Some of us stick racers did this early this year.
__________________
Sam Murray
1616 STK
Sam Murray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2007, 01:37 PM   #36
bsa633
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: What about STOCK ?

if there is a simple way i think it would be nice if stock became a "foot break" only class,sure the good racers would still win,but maybe we could see a little more people winning...or maybe less who knows...but still there would a bigger window to win i think...would be harder to "flashrace"...frankly i am getting a little bored of that it takes .020 or better the whole way to win races nowdays...am i the only one getting bored with that?more machine than people....
bsa633 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2007, 01:47 PM   #37
Chip THELEGEND Johnson
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 284
Likes: 223
Liked 281 Times in 79 Posts
Default Re: What about STOCK ?

I say allow Delay boxes and transbrakes or Make it FOOTBRAKE ONLY NO BUTTONS AT ALL.

Chip Johnson
Chip THELEGEND Johnson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2007, 08:47 AM   #38
tgriffith
Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: What about STOCK ?

"""020 or better the whole way to win races nowdays"""

a year or so ago,,,I told you guys that this was going to happen,,,,I even posted average RTs of what I could find,,I think the years of 1999,2000,,,,2001 and 2002 of selected races and then the average RT`s of 2005 and beginning of 2006,,,,,,,If I can find that topic,,I `ll repost it,,,,,,,,I think I deleted all my post because 99% of racers had the opinion that I was crying and need to shut up and learn how to race......the results I found were staggering,,,,,that in just a year,,,most all of the stock professionals had suddenly learn how to trim a consistent .03 off their RT`s in a national event setting,,,,,,,,,,and most of these guys doing so had other pro tree cars, whether it was a super car of some type or superstocker.........one of the most alarming things I found was the disappearance of slow index cars........now this typf of increase in RT pointed to a different method of racing,,,either everyone is cheating (which I dont believe in one second) or everyone is moving to faster cars to "pro tree race",,,,,,,,,,sure enough,,,thats what it is

This is just an opinion,,what you will soon see in the near future,, everyone that races seriously in stock,,,more heads up races because even as we speak,,,racers that dont have A- E cars are selling what they do have and finding them so they can be competitive.......Ive noticed that on here and other sites,,more slower cars are finding their way on the market at a lower price

If steps arent taken to stop this spending,,,it will be nearly impossible to be competitive without spending 75k for a stocker...I really believe that the elimination of the 2steps and button is a step in the rite direction ....time will tell I guess
tgriffith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2007, 08:51 AM   #39
tgriffith
Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: What about STOCK ?

one other thing,,,,,It is up to the majority to change the rules,,,,Nhra/Ihra isnt interested in making changes that would help a w/sa pinto or a chevette,,(LOL) but this has a trickle down effect because it would also help the I/sa and slower cars also
tgriffith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2007, 10:32 AM   #40
Bunkster
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Liked 43 Times in 10 Posts
Default Re: What about STOCK ?

While spending all this time on the starting system, why not finally....finally...fix the red light inequality in handicap racing. It is downright ignorant to continue this "first" red light thing.

Imbrogno, do the right thing and institute the "worst" red light. You know it's the right thing to do. This thing of some drivers not having to take a shot at the tree is flat wrong. If anyone tells you "we've done it that way from day one", then tell them "...and we've been doing it wrong all that time, too."

It is not required you take a vote. It is not even necessary that you tell anyone when you do it. Just do it.

Or, if you won't change to a "worst" red light system, then be consistent and change the finish line to a "first" breakout system. That way, the lunacy would be the same at both ends of the track.
Bunkster is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.