HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-15-2022, 01:12 PM   #31
Frank Castros
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: The Lowcountry.
Posts: 2,975
Likes: 2,586
Liked 2,725 Times in 961 Posts
Default Re: Divisional at Famoso

He's been racing that car for a few years, I presume he knows the rules and specs for that combination.
Frank Castros is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked
Old 10-15-2022, 01:54 PM   #32
Carguy49
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Fife, Washington
Posts: 1,978
Likes: 2,469
Liked 2,946 Times in 708 Posts
Default Re: Divisional at Famoso

First off, the car looks beautiful. I see that Joe is having trouble running the index. Didn't hit it in SS/JA and is barely under in SS/KA today.

It is, obviously a small tire car. Was it built to Stock specs or S/S specs?? There is a difference and has the car been under index in S/S before, or run as a stocker ever. Just curious.

Thanks Jared for the info that you added.
__________________
Ron McDowell - Did Race
Every day is a Gift - Enjoy with family and friends.
Carguy49 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2022, 02:01 PM   #33
4284spd
VIP Member
 
4284spd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Longmont Colorado
Posts: 1,709
Likes: 848
Liked 4,139 Times in 950 Posts
Default Re: Divisional at Famoso

I sure wish Warren was still doing Division races! NHRA TV SUCK's!
__________________
Bob Smith
4284spd is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked
Old 10-15-2022, 03:08 PM   #34
GTX JOHN
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Boulder City, Nevada 89005
Posts: 2,733
Likes: 2,799
Liked 2,486 Times in 697 Posts
Default Re: Divisional at Famoso

MY mistake = The 301 is legal at this time.
The 666 which possibly is a better intake maybe
is the one currently illegal on the 64 383.
I assume that was the problem.

The manifold rules have moved around a bit on this combo
and I am not current on it.
__________________
John Irving
741 Stock
741 Super Stock
GTX JOHN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2022, 03:08 PM   #35
Todd Hoven
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Divisional at Famoso

Is this the new standard for tech? An infraction in Tech or a 1.20 under run, and you get a mulligan? Will this be applied evenly or on a case by case basis? So if I commit a 1.20 under infraction in qualifying so I get to change class or just ask to the tech department to DQ me for the race? So I keep my HP down? Now that there is no 1.20 instant after this year this is a moot point.
Is there any penalties anymore for rule infraction anymore? This is becoming a disturbing trend.




Quote:
Originally Posted by Jared Jordan View Post
I don’t know which number casting was on it but my understanding is that it was a later-model, stock 383 casting that wasn’t correct for the 64 383.

They’ve run the same car in SS/JA previously with an Edelbrock single plane intake.

I truly believe this was an honest mistake and the driver, when he was told by another racer that he had the incorrect casting on the engine, self-reported himself to NHRA and was permitted to reclassify into SS.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2022, 03:41 PM   #36
Gregg Luneack
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 202
Likes: 9
Liked 225 Times in 30 Posts
Default Re: Divisional at Famoso

I believe that this was an honest mistake, Joe is
not a full time racer. All of you that are complaining
give him a break, as soon as he was told it was wrong
he reported to NHRA. He was not trying to cheat, he
did not know that manifold was no longer legal.
Why is nobody bitching about the 305 engine that was
never offered in a Camaro but NHRA let it run all year?
Gregg Luneack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2022, 04:35 PM   #37
Todd Hoven
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Divisional at Famoso

I’m sure he is a good guy and and salt of the earth. If you don’t apply the rules evenly and without prejudice that’s a problem. Do we need a court of
opinion now before any rules are enforced? Who decides on who is a good guy and who is not? Is that the new standard?



Quote:
Originally Posted by Gregg Luneack View Post
I believe that this was an honest mistake, Joe is
not a full time racer. All of you that are complaining
give him a break, as soon as he was told it was wrong
he reported to NHRA. He was not trying to cheat, he
did not know that manifold was no longer legal.
Why is nobody bitching about the 305 engine that was
never offered in a Camaro but NHRA let it run all year?

Last edited by Todd Hoven; 10-15-2022 at 04:49 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2022, 05:09 PM   #38
duster1256
Junior Member
 
duster1256's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 76
Likes: 21
Liked 20 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: Divisional at Famoso

Any photos of all the stockers?
duster1256 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2022, 06:29 PM   #39
Joe Schweigert
Member
 
Joe Schweigert's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ontario, calif
Posts: 211
Likes: 61
Liked 19 Times in 8 Posts
Default Re: Divisional at Famoso

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gregg Luneack View Post
I believe that this was an honest mistake, Joe is
not a full time racer. All of you that are complaining
give him a break, as soon as he was told it was wrong
he reported to NHRA. He was not trying to cheat, he
did not know that manifold was no longer legal.
Why is nobody bitching about the 305 engine that was
never offered in a Camaro but NHRA let it run all year?
Greg ...I'm confused the 305 was the only V8 in the early Gen 3 Camaros at least in California ?
__________________
Joe Schweigert 751 SS
Joe Schweigert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2022, 08:32 PM   #40
GTX JOHN
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Boulder City, Nevada 89005
Posts: 2,733
Likes: 2,799
Liked 2,486 Times in 697 Posts
Default Re: Divisional at Famoso

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTX JOHN View Post
MY mistake = The 301 is legal at this time.
The 666 which possibly is a better intake maybe
is the one currently illegal on the 64 383.
I assume that was the problem.

The manifold rules have moved around a bit on this combo
and I am not current on it.
Well we just got back from the Class Final in D/SA.
While in the back behind the lanes while preparing for the
final = The two guys who were running this 64 came up to
me and got in my face and asked me, Are you that John Irving
that posted this reply to this thread. I replied in the affirmative.
He then said "Do you want to fight me". I have never met him before.
Most of you guys know I am in my Mid 70's and I am struggling just
to walk around after my last couple surgeries. These gentlemen are 1/2
my age!! I am very surprised at this situation!!
__________________
John Irving
741 Stock
741 Super Stock
GTX JOHN is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.