|
07-15-2011, 06:33 PM | #41 | |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 852
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: New Horse Power Ratings
Even Danny gets new Ford or Lincoln to drive
Quote:
|
|
07-15-2011, 11:49 PM | #42 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,220
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Re: New Horse Power Ratings
|
07-16-2011, 12:04 AM | #43 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 199
Likes: 108
Liked 92 Times in 19 Posts
|
Re: New Horse Power Ratings
I will give you a George Foreman guarantee that that car has never gone close to 10.59! That ride is one fast SOB but not that fast.
It is amazing how fast and far great rumors like that spread.
__________________
Brad Zaskowski 3697 STK, SS |
07-16-2011, 07:41 AM | #44 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,234
Likes: 3,132
Liked 6,840 Times in 1,535 Posts
|
Re: New Horse Power Ratings
"Never let the truth get in the way of a good story!"
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS Reality, what a concept! |
07-16-2011, 09:02 AM | #45 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 914
Likes: 458
Liked 164 Times in 63 Posts
|
Re: New Horse Power Ratings
How about 10.937? Is that pretty close?
__________________
Mike Fuller 396 STK Last edited by Mike Fuller; 07-16-2011 at 10:06 AM. |
07-16-2011, 09:56 AM | #46 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 801
Likes: 1
Liked 10 Times in 6 Posts
|
Re: New Horse Power Ratings
Brad, How about 123mph. in E/FI at Martin, Mi. Tom
__________________
Tom Moock 5704 STK |
07-16-2011, 11:20 AM | #47 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,220
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Re: New Horse Power Ratings
|
07-16-2011, 11:31 AM | #48 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 119
Likes: 8
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
|
Re: New Horse Power Ratings
anybody know what 68-70 428 was at 389?
i thought the n head motor was 380 and the aluminum head motor was at 383 thanks |
07-16-2011, 03:02 PM | #49 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 701
Likes: 428
Liked 170 Times in 38 Posts
|
Re: New Horse Power Ratings
It went 129 testing, what a joke.
I can't blame someone for building an underfactored car like this, but writing a letter to get horsepower off, absolutely ridiculous.
__________________
3207 D/SA, C/ED |
07-16-2011, 03:07 PM | #50 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 310
Likes: 1
Liked 134 Times in 31 Posts
|
Re: New Horse Power Ratings
|
|
|