|
![]() |
#41 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: CARMEL, INDIANA
Posts: 141
Likes: 69
Liked 48 Times in 18 Posts
|
![]()
Terry,
U got that right!!!! Just ask me I live in a $600 mo apt and lost the house kept the biz. By the way in Indianer we are court ordered to pay college not that we wouldnt anyway lynn's kids are smart so they get lots of scholarship money. The blond wife is an enigma. ![]() Yes we tried, evidently edlebrock doesnt want to entertain running a special production of heads...the heads that were available were a nightmare to get approved. If it were me I would have given up way before lynn did. U have two big corporations trying to tell each other how to do things and it just doesn't always work. Its just not worth edlebrocks time to run a special head for just a few people. They say show me the money!! ![]() So I'll tell you right now they have to already be making one close before it will even fly!!!! A lot of these decisions are made because there is no economic benefit to the companies. I think racers forget this sometimes. NHRA is a Biz and so is Edlebrock. Again if you think you have a legitimate case present it!! Then prepare to spend alot of time and energy to get it done ![]() Its on a case by case basis and the precedent seems to be availability and cost. There are tech officials for this and against it also, but I dont know anyone thats for opening it up to any combo. There are some reasons for it but the reasons against it far outweight them at this time. My guess is that it will move that direction over time anyway. They're all just realizing the benefits. ![]() Stacy GTAA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#42 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Although it seems logical for every motor to have an aluminum head, it wouldn't be practical for NHRA. Not every available aftermarket aluminum head retains the factory head specifications as far as volumes and valve sizes are concerned. It's hard to imagine NHRA having to mandate their own approved castings for every combo in SS, whenever they claim to be non-profit for the Sportsmen.
Ignoring that part of it, I would like to see NHRA get rid of the intake/exhaust runner volume limits for the factory castings, then control it with HP (maybe ten HP added from initial HP.) Then you could run the aluminum castings as well, but you would have to retain factory volumes, but no initial HP would be added. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#43 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 963
Likes: 341
Liked 161 Times in 52 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Stephen Johnson #2162 Horace Johnson #2167 SS/D 427 Ford Fairlane NHRA-IHRA |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#44 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Mattapoisett MA
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Can the World Products 4360 be used as a replacement for the 441 head 250/290 horse combination?
Thanks |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#45 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 494
Likes: 6
Liked 25 Times in 16 Posts
|
![]()
Since the Pontiacs had machined chambers from the factory, can Edelbrock just CNC the chamber to get closer to the 102cc chamber? I don't know how much material is in there to get it all the way to 102cc, but maybe if they can get it to 95cc then add HP to compensate, that would seem to be a good compromise.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#46 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 1710 Dutch Lane,Jeffersonville,IN
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Being in this buisness I can definately see both sides of this argument,and both have valid points.One thing is for sure,if N.H.R.A. ever did decide to do something like this they need to give everyone a couple of years notice.
We have built a few engines that can run factory heads or take the 5 h.p. hit and run the world/dart iron head and I probably don't have to tell you which one everyone picks,and who can blame them.My point is as long is there is a h.p. advantage to the factory heads people will continue to build and run them. The thing that really sucks when these kind of things come up is that while you make things more reliable for one group of racers ,you force a whole other group to make the decision to stop racing.Do this kind of thig enough times and you end up with nobody to race. On a closing note,do you really want to be remembered as the guys who took the last stock part out of super stock?I honestly could'nt tell you if that would be a good thing or a bad thing to be remembered for,but it is something that probably will be looked upon as a real turning point,be it for better or worse. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#47 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#48 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#49 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Dunnellon,FL
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]()
There's a simple solution here.....change the rules and not allow any more porting and polishing!
Or, an expensive solution.....make everyone buy aluminum heads whereupon the odd engine/make car guys get gouged buy edlebrock while you chevy guys pay very little for yours. JimR
__________________
Jim Rountree |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#50 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
All the older engines (50's,60',s,70's) need to have a legal replacement option. Some of you are looking for 40 year old heads today, that will be 50 year old heads 10 years from now! The integrity of super stock (and stock) is long gone. They are legal, but I don't think .937 keyway lifters and sheet intakes are in the spirit of the class, but it is what it is. A super stock motor is nothing less than a comp elim. motor with less compression, and legal part numbers on the heads and carb(s). Fords and Chevys already have the option, the wedge mopars need the same.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|