|
![]() |
#41 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Boulder City, Nevada 89005
Posts: 2,733
Likes: 2,799
Liked 2,484 Times in 697 Posts
|
![]()
As I recall John did most of his own work from carb down. I believe he was 60 plus even then and one of my Heros.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#42 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: The Lowcountry.
Posts: 2,973
Likes: 2,586
Liked 2,723 Times in 960 Posts
|
![]()
Guys,
Do you believe the '70 340 Six Pack factored at 328 HP is still a good combination for D/S? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#43 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Boulder City, Nevada 89005
Posts: 2,733
Likes: 2,799
Liked 2,484 Times in 697 Posts
|
![]()
Absolutely
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#44 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 384
Likes: 101
Liked 419 Times in 85 Posts
|
![]()
The 1970 340 6bbl is 320hp with a stick. It is 328 with an automatic.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#45 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: TN
Posts: 530
Likes: 422
Liked 242 Times in 81 Posts
|
![]()
I think the 340 6 pack Challenger is a great combo. That is why I started building one. With all the enhancements it has been sitting for a couple of years. Gene is the only person I know of that ever made one fly. Steve Hahn tried it in the 70's never ran strong. McCoy in div 6 has a AAR very consistent car goes rounds but not real quick. Errol Farmer has a AAR it was pretty quick. At 320 hp It is a great combo compared to 314 for the HC Thermoquad combo.
__________________
Rod Greene Real men shift for them selves. Slowly working on TA Challenger for D,E/S and a 72 Challenger for SS/K, L as if I don't have enough other projects. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#46 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: The Lowcountry.
Posts: 2,973
Likes: 2,586
Liked 2,723 Times in 960 Posts
|
![]()
Thanks guys,
Someone stated that Gene ran C/SA with his Challenger. It seems like it would be difficult to get an E-body that light. Agree? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#47 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#48 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 198
Likes: 7
Liked 11 Times in 5 Posts
|
![]()
The 340 Hi Comp is at 305 HP for a stick car.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#49 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: TN
Posts: 530
Likes: 422
Liked 242 Times in 81 Posts
|
![]()
70 CHALLENGER TA as an auto 328 hp X 9 + 170 = 3122
An E body is not that much heavier than an A body with the glass hood, aluminum manifold, 4 wheel after market brakes, super light wheels, CM roll bar, small fuel cell 2900 lbs is easy. I know i have one. The 71 340 is rated at 314 in the classification guide for A and E bodies it used to be 310 in E bodies but an A body guy wrote a letter to NHRA and got the hp added to the E. The 70 340 AVS is 299 which isn't bad if you have Chuck Beach build you a carb.
__________________
Rod Greene Real men shift for them selves. Slowly working on TA Challenger for D,E/S and a 72 Challenger for SS/K, L as if I don't have enough other projects. Last edited by Rod Greene; 10-29-2010 at 12:24 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#50 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Parker, CO.
Posts: 728
Likes: 165
Liked 14 Times in 11 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
somebody needs to buy his Challenger and bring it back out to race.
__________________
Phil Saran Parker, Colorado |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|