|
![]() |
#41 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 61
Likes: 1
Liked 47 Times in 6 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Obviously in stock it doesn't say "Any" so that pretty much answers your question
__________________
Erik Jones |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#42 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Duncannon, PA
Posts: 819
Likes: 131
Liked 478 Times in 80 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#43 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,486
Likes: 3,587
Liked 7,683 Times in 1,731 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Let's get something straight, the people who USE the parts Should be heard the loudest!
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#44 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 458
Likes: 166
Liked 124 Times in 39 Posts
|
![]()
Mama
__________________
Sean Cour T6066 ladle Last edited by Sean Cour; 12-09-2019 at 06:02 PM. Reason: Nipple twisting |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#45 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 362
Likes: 6
Liked 302 Times in 73 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Bryan, I think Eric's point is that if the intake he has shown the picture of is legal then why does it matter if I go buy a Edelbrock big block chevy head to install on my small block Ford engine. All it would take is some sort of adapter plates and boom I have my intake.. thats the sprit of the word "ANY"... If the want to write a rule that stops the heads from being modified to "cheat" the runner volume than go ahead.. but leave the intake out of the rule.. I don't know either of you or really have a dog in this discussion as I only run stock.. BUT this rule does seem a bit stupid if it in fact does mean you can only buy an out of the box aftermarket intake and port it or spend $$$ and go sheetmetal but anything in between is now deemed illegal.. To answer you question though.. just as Erik said.. no running incorrect intakes shouldn't carry over to stock. they SHOULD be factory no matter what and have the correct casting# just as the rule book states.. SS is a different animal. Brad |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#46 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 575
Likes: 298
Liked 747 Times in 136 Posts
|
![]()
Gents, let take a breath. This is getting heated, and while it certainly should be getting heated, a lot of the 'heat' seems to be over the wrong aspect of this rule, at least in my opinion.
Most folks are focusing on the manifold-end of this rule, and also on the 'spacers'. Since in SS, pretty much any intake manifold modifications are allowed, there is really no concern over this rule affecting the manifold designs out there. Regarding not allowing 'spacers', fine, so now I'll just tig-weld my 'spacer' to the manifold. Its now just a modified manifold, (allowed), or I'll just create an entire manifold from scratch. The real issue with this rule impacts the HEADS not the manifold. The intake-face angle to combustion-surface angle limitation is the reason this rule is a very big deal, unprecedented, and in my opinion, is unfair. This was never previously a dimension that was called out on the blueprint specs, or the rulebook. Hence up to this point folks were permitted to do whatever they desired regarding this angle. As a result of this new rule, I believe a lot more heads are now 'illegal' than the intended batch of heads that the folks who lobbied for this rule intended to target. Kp |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#47 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Duncannon, PA
Posts: 819
Likes: 131
Liked 478 Times in 80 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
And Brad, I surely hope you meant Intake and not Chevy heads for your Ford motor. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#48 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: TN
Posts: 530
Likes: 420
Liked 242 Times in 81 Posts
|
![]()
So, answer my question. Should we allow the swapping of intake makes and adapter plates in Stock eliminator?
How does this even enter the discussion of SS heads? Off your meds? All stock manifolds have factory part number.
__________________
Rod Greene Real men shift for them selves. Slowly working on TA Challenger for D,E/S and a 72 Challenger for SS/K, L as if I don't have enough other projects. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#49 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 575
Likes: 298
Liked 747 Times in 136 Posts
|
![]()
Rod, sorry if I missed it, (there are now many pages), but I didn't think this thread ever pertained to Stock. This thread was a Super Stock discussion.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#50 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,809
Likes: 2,900
Liked 5,114 Times in 1,948 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Everyone knows what the intake face angle should be on all the popular combinations. That angle should be what's allowed. That, and the v.c. bolt hole limit. The spacers shouldn't have anything to do with this. Someone could change the head angle, then build a custom manifold to match it, if it were allowed. Also, I believe some of the spacers would have to use countersunk bolts into the head, and then they would be covered up by the manifold pattern. So, no, you couldn't just weld the spacers to the manifold. *Edit : I just read post # 12. I assume this was lifted from the new rule book.. Is this under intakes or heads? This , too me , looks like NO adapters at all, in S/S. I guess the saving grace here is that not too much of y'all's money could be going to their lawyers. What a bunch of contradictory gibberish.
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers Last edited by Mark Yacavone; 12-10-2019 at 01:03 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|