HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > .90 Heads Up Class Racing
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-09-2010, 07:22 PM   #51
super comp 112
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: What Changes In Super Classes Would You Like To See

Quote:
Originally Posted by chris williams View Post
you went back to fix the spelling and still got it wrong?
i did some research and found nhra has a class for you to run ever weekend its called trophy.
super comp 112 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2010, 07:48 PM   #52
SGSST109E
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 346
Likes: 54
Liked 126 Times in 60 Posts
Default Re: What Changes In Super Classes Would You Like To See

Make all super classes a .550 pro tree. Then there would be more cars back in SG
SGSST109E is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2010, 10:30 PM   #53
RacingRicki
Sponsor
 
RacingRicki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: What Changes In Super Classes Would You Like To See

I would just be happy if they gave us a real .400 tree in SG. .500 would be good too. Heavy SST cars just have too hard of a time on the current .370 (a.k.a. .400) tree. So even fast SST cars won't be able to move up to SG without spending lots of cash on chassis upgrades or getting a new car.
RacingRicki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2010, 08:48 AM   #54
frank v
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: ny
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Smile Re: What Changes In Super Classes Would You Like To See

the Federico rule.........no chassis cars in super street.
__________________
s/g 1620
frank v is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2010, 08:51 AM   #55
frank v
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: ny
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: What Changes In Super Classes Would You Like To See

i also would like to see a real .400 tree
__________________
s/g 1620
frank v is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2010, 09:30 AM   #56
Dave Steltz
Member
 
Dave Steltz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: What Changes In Super Classes Would You Like To See

Quote:
Originally Posted by frank v View Post
the Federico rule.........no chassis cars in super street.
Well now thats funny, I dont care who ya are !!!!
__________________
Dave Steltz 135G SG/SP/SST
BIAECH Racing Team
Dave Steltz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2010, 12:05 PM   #57
Chris Williams
Member
 
Chris Williams's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Woodinville, WA
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: What Changes In Super Classes Would You Like To See

Quote:
Originally Posted by super comp 112 View Post
i did some research and found nhra has a class for you to run every weekend it's called trophy.
My point, Einstein, is that we're ALL running trophy, all the time. The purse and contingency are just gravy.
__________________
Chris Williams 6304 SC, TD, ET
Chris Williams is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2010, 12:20 PM   #58
voltdr
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 702
Likes: 77
Liked 88 Times in 48 Posts
Default Re: What Changes In Super Classes Would You Like To See

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Williams View Post
My point, Einstein, is that we're ALL running trophy, all the time. The purse and contingency are just gravy.
I agree with you Chris. Years ago even David Rampy had to quit racing until he could find a sponsor to help make ends meet. I'll bet if Dan Fletcher would respond to this he would tell the same story. Both of these guys win a lot and need help to pays the bills. If you build a drag car with the idea of making money, you should sell it before you race it.
Dan Foley
SC4698
voltdr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2010, 12:59 PM   #59
billy leber
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: most places
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 1 Post
Default Re: What Changes In Super Classes Would You Like To See

Quote:
Originally Posted by TS310C View Post
I do see your point. But for those of us that already have the equipment to go 170 what are we supposed to do with it? Sell it for .50 on the dollar and by a smaller motor? I also think there are a number of racers (myself included) that like to go fast and don't want to slow down. I don't think it is near as exciting to go 140 as it is to go 170+. If I wanted to go slow I would be racing stock.
I respect your opinion,but to me , going 140 in my super stocker or 170 in my super gas car dosent feel much different after about the third run of the year. I guess this is unfortunate for me! lol
__________________
Billy Leber 1150 SS, 1050 SG, 1962 STK, 185 SC
billy leber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2010, 02:25 PM   #60
Tom Goldman
VIP Member
 
Tom Goldman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Allentown,PA
Posts: 2,438
Likes: 786
Liked 703 Times in 206 Posts
Default Re: What Changes In Super Classes Would You Like To See

I dont understand the bitchin about the tree.
My old car at 2750# and a 30year old 468 still had .020 to .030 in the box on a .370 tree.
They put all those holes in the 4 link and knobs on the shocks fo a reason ya know!
I have to run as much as .080 in the box at the MASGA races on a true .4 tree..and let me tell you it sucks when you have that much in ,when you miss the tree, you REALLY miss the tree!
__________________
Tom Goldman 1500 SG , 1506 STK

Last edited by Tom Goldman; 12-10-2010 at 05:09 PM.
Tom Goldman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.