|
![]() |
#51 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]()
Fred's new GTX car is very very fast.
Thanks |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#52 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Modesto, CA
Posts: 639
Likes: 90
Liked 547 Times in 94 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Fred has had health problems and, as a result of medication he is taking, has been unable to get his license renewed. His car is fast and legal. So there's your hmmmmmmm.
__________________
Julie Jordan 7549 STK |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#53 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Sulphur Springs Texas
Posts: 743
Likes: 146
Liked 166 Times in 46 Posts
|
![]()
Just curious,,,
Can anyone tell me why a Camaro/Nova/Chevelle are lumped together now, didn't used to be, and a B body Chrysler is different from an E body? Hopefully I can ask a question on here without being called a crybaby... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#54 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
JIM, that is a good question and that is why the AHFS is flawed, very flawed....why are HP factors not the same regardless of which body style or model when they all have the identical motor....
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#55 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anthem, Arizona
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
1970 - 1972 B body has Ram-Charger style option (flip up style) air-grabber if that's what you want. Of course the E body 1970-1971 have the shaker ot T/A & AAR hoods for fresh air induction. 1968-1969 B body's also have a weak flush mounted air-grabber induction but there were no E bodies in those years so comparrison is not needed. So no, there's absolutely no reason one platform needs a 27 HP AHFS penalty. And I'm glad to hear Mr. Henson now has a 426 B body. I'm sure he and Mr. Holton will prove I'm right. 'Cause you guys don't lay down, right? ![]()
__________________
Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#56 | |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
with that said..The guys still running all out must be commended for doing what this is all about..not the other way..i also understand the guys working hard to be the fastest just to be rewarded with more lead holding back..this continous adding weight has to stop somewhere..i hope that lowering the index with a keept trigger will show somewhat were the cars stand right now...this system has made all stay at -1.15(well not exactly all then)and i think it could be totally screwed between some cars and makes...it never seemed to be this much of a problem with the "old system" p.s. before alot of people start jumping about lowering the index again..with comment like $$$-heads,bring stock valvesprings back,or so..this is the reality right now!..there are some combo's that are hard..i know...but they have to be lowered in hp then..not saved by an index! Last edited by bsa633; 07-07-2008 at 05:43 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#57 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Gibsonton, FL
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#58 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 64
Liked 779 Times in 193 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#59 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Spring, Texas
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Hey D-White, I have to face several of 'em everyday!!!!!!!!
__________________
Charlie Ford 4729 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#60 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 64
Liked 779 Times in 193 Posts
|
![]()
Yup, Charlie-O, we know that. That's why you get a bit of "speshull" treatment, if you know what I mean.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|