HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-06-2008, 08:03 PM   #51
Jeremy
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: 2008 Mid Year Stock, Super Stock Horsepower Adjustments Announced

Fred's new GTX car is very very fast.
Thanks
Jeremy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2008, 08:23 PM   #52
Julie Jordan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Modesto, CA
Posts: 639
Likes: 90
Liked 547 Times in 94 Posts
Default Re: 2008 Mid Year Stock, Super Stock Horsepower Adjustments Announced

Quote:
Originally Posted by herbjr View Post
Henson went red, didnt scale, went fast and now he isnt racing....hmmmmmmmm.

Fred has had health problems and, as a result of medication he is taking, has been unable to get his license renewed. His car is fast and legal. So there's your hmmmmmmm.
__________________
Julie Jordan 7549 STK
Julie Jordan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2008, 09:03 PM   #53
Jim Cimarolli
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Sulphur Springs Texas
Posts: 743
Likes: 146
Liked 166 Times in 46 Posts
Smile Re: 2008 Mid Year Stock, Super Stock Horsepower Adjustments Announced

Just curious,,,
Can anyone tell me why a Camaro/Nova/Chevelle are lumped together now, didn't used to be, and a B body Chrysler is different from an E body?
Hopefully I can ask a question on here without being called a crybaby...
Jim Cimarolli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2008, 12:39 AM   #54
JD Smith
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Talking Re: 2008 Mid Year Stock, Super Stock Horsepower Adjustments Announced

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Cimarolli View Post
Just curious,,,
Can anyone tell me why a Camaro/Nova/Chevelle are lumped together now, didn't used to be, and a B body Chrysler is different from an E body?
Hopefully I can ask a question on here without being called a crybaby...
JIM, that is a good question and that is why the AHFS is flawed, very flawed....why are HP factors not the same regardless of which body style or model when they all have the identical motor....
JD Smith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2008, 02:07 AM   #55
Jeff Lee
VIP Member
 
Jeff Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anthem, Arizona
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: 2008 Mid Year Stock, Super Stock Horsepower Adjustments Announced

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Cimarolli View Post
Just curious,,,
Can anyone tell me why a Camaro/Nova/Chevelle are lumped together now, didn't used to be, and a B body Chrysler is different from an E body?
Hopefully I can ask a question on here without being called a crybaby...
Other than wheelbase and the body, they're basically the same platform. B & E body floors and structures all pretty much interchange, shelf headers are sold as B & E body units. E bodies have a slight rear frame angle difference butthat's not an issue on only 9" wide slicks. And even at 130-135 MPH, you couldn't convince me there's an aerodynamic advantage one over the other.
1970 - 1972 B body has Ram-Charger style option (flip up style) air-grabber if that's what you want. Of course the E body 1970-1971 have the shaker ot T/A & AAR hoods for fresh air induction. 1968-1969 B body's also have a weak flush mounted air-grabber induction but there were no E bodies in those years so comparrison is not needed.
So no, there's absolutely no reason one platform needs a 27 HP AHFS penalty. And I'm glad to hear Mr. Henson now has a 426 B body. I'm sure he and Mr. Holton will prove I'm right. 'Cause you guys don't lay down, right?
__________________
Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX
Jeff Lee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2008, 05:36 AM   #56
bsa633
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 2008 Mid Year Stock, Super Stock Horsepower Adjustments Announced

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Cimarolli View Post
Just curious,,,
Can anyone tell me why a Camaro/Nova/Chevelle are lumped together now, didn't used to be, and a B body Chrysler is different from an E body?
Hopefully I can ask a question on here without being called a crybaby...
If the mopars been lumped together the average probably would been more favorable..in the thing that happened before...you could almost say the Iron Nova was saved by a Camaro...and the chevelle was just a byestander in that "race"(well he came up with the idea ofcourse) ..maybe the mopars would get the same chance then?

with that said..The guys still running all out must be commended for doing what this is all about..not the other way..i also understand the guys working hard to be the fastest just to be rewarded with more lead holding back..this continous adding weight has to stop somewhere..i hope that lowering the index with a keept trigger will show somewhat were the cars stand right now...this system has made all stay at -1.15(well not exactly all then)and i think it could be totally screwed between some cars and makes...it never seemed to be this much of a problem with the "old system"

p.s. before alot of people start jumping about lowering the index again..with comment like $$$-heads,bring stock valvesprings back,or so..this is the reality right now!..there are some combo's that are hard..i know...but they have to be lowered in hp then..not saved by an index!

Last edited by bsa633; 07-07-2008 at 05:43 AM.
bsa633 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2008, 09:36 AM   #57
Smitty
Member
 
Smitty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Gibsonton, FL
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: 2008 Mid Year Stock, Super Stock Horsepower Adjustments Announced

Quote:
Originally Posted by clutch man View Post
So hawk still has the fastest car of all but no HP????????????
In a sport that is over populated with GM products there are still people that aren't happy unless a Ford product is factored out of competiveness.
Smitty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2008, 12:33 PM   #58
Dwight Southerland
VIP Member
 
Dwight Southerland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 64
Liked 779 Times in 193 Posts
Default Re: 2008 Mid Year Stock, Super Stock Horsepower Adjustments Announced

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1664SSJA View Post
Yeah, funny how I keep hearing whining about Hawk and Miele, yet no one builds one.
Most of us do not own a wrench that will fit a Ford, much less the mental attitude to face one everyday.
Dwight Southerland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2008, 12:43 PM   #59
Charlie Ford
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Spring, Texas
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 2008 Mid Year Stock, Super Stock Horsepower Adjustments Announced

Hey D-White, I have to face several of 'em everyday!!!!!!!!
__________________
Charlie Ford 4729 STK
Charlie Ford is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2008, 04:58 PM   #60
Dwight Southerland
VIP Member
 
Dwight Southerland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 64
Liked 779 Times in 193 Posts
Default Re: 2008 Mid Year Stock, Super Stock Horsepower Adjustments Announced

Yup, Charlie-O, we know that. That's why you get a bit of "speshull" treatment, if you know what I mean.
Dwight Southerland is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.