|
![]() |
#51 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 1,999
Likes: 64
Liked 772 Times in 192 Posts
|
![]()
As a point of interest, the 1969 Chev 350-255 was the first engine to get an other-than-OEM hp factor, and that happened in 1970. A lot of that move was due to racer complaints, although Farmer was in charge at that time and executed through his authority an attempt to level the playing field, so to speak. New technology always throws additional factors to contend with into the mix. NHRA will respond in some addtional ways to deal the new cars; it will be interesting to see what they do. Everybody has a dog in this hunt.
The new cars bring excitement and more general interest into the sport and that is good. I hate that it is so-o-o-o-o expensive to proliferate the excitement. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#52 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Jackson, NJ
Posts: 312
Likes: 3
Liked 111 Times in 26 Posts
|
![]()
5 Pages of comments, and nobody addresses the simple problem. If FS qualify on the same sheet as ANY other class it MUST follow ALL of the same rules!!!!!! otherwise there is NO need to be on the sheet. You can twist the facts anyway that helps you justify breaking the rules.
__________________
Richard Preiser 1613 FGT/I 1510 C/SA 161 F/DA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#53 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,220
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#54 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,220
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#55 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Red Oak, TX
Posts: 441
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Rich,
Maybe I was not clear enough. Below is quoted from my earlier post... "BUT, I do not agree with letting the FS cars qualify on the ladder with NO worry of HP. Because of the bye runs, this is unfair, and no way to defend it... math here, not just heart strings!" I will agree again. And use math again... as long as they can play this game to qualify without fear of HP, why would you not try for #1, or where ever looks best for the bye run opportunities? This is not about the cost of new cars, etc. Not about technology, being jealous, etc. Not even about heads up runs... Once the shoe polish goes on the window, it is just a race. They are just being given an unfair advantage. This is just ANOTHER instance of NHRA hurting the future of the sport. It feels like they continue to try to drive the average working man out of the sport??? Ken Stock 412 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#56 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]()
With all the hoopla about all the excitement over the new cars (usually coming from guys running them), did anybody notice the stands at Indy when they ran? LOL
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#57 | ||
VIP Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 4,060
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 9 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Throughout the myriad of threads regarding the new factory cars, the overwhelming complaint is not with the cars, the car owners, or even the factories. Ultimately, the primary issues revolve around HP factors. NHRA has set the precedent with its baseline factored HP of the factory cars, so it is unlikely they will change. Also based on precedent, it is reasonable that they would create separate FX classes to allow them factor themselves without bludgeoning traditional Stockers heads-up in the meantime. While it doesn't address qualifying (bye runs), it's a start. Quote:
Yes, the new cars are cool. VERY cool. VERY impressive. Factory Stock is even cooler. I'd like to have a race for them. As I've stated before, no has asked that they be factored unrealistically high and rendered uncompetitive, but neither should they be factored unrealistically low. There exists a great deal of space inbetween that could be palatable to ALL parties. Enjoying and appreciating the factory cars is not mutually exclusive with realistic administration. Standard disclaimer: I run a 'factory' engine in SS/GT. Despite better specs all the way around, it is rated 50 HP *less* than my Crate Motor was. My wife told me to build this engine! $.02,
__________________
Michael Beard - NHRA/IHRA 3216 S/SS Last edited by Michael Beard; 10-07-2014 at 04:10 PM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#58 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Shoe polish people. Nobody has to sell or park anything. Such a simple fix but everybody including the guys who are getting their a$$e$ kicked don't wanna change it. Get out of the 70s
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#59 |
Live Reporter
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New Bern, NC
Posts: 3,467
Likes: 146
Liked 3,363 Times in 731 Posts
|
![]()
This has nothing to do with what we are talking about, its the fact that these cars can run -1.50 something qualify #1 and there is no repercussions come Monday. If I do the same thing with I/SA car I have to face the music so to speak.
__________________
James Williamson W200 J/SA. SS/JA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#60 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,220
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|