|
![]() |
#61 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Liked 51 Times in 25 Posts
|
![]()
I never sat in one of those new Mustangs but they must be hard to see out of to take a 1/2 second stripe on a heads up run.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#62 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Aberdeen SD
Posts: 645
Likes: 30
Liked 112 Times in 31 Posts
|
![]()
I know one thing about this whole discussion and that's the Boss is definitely over rated.
Rick |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#63 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lake Tapps, Washington
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Alan; correct again! and if the booster is a restriction, how about the fuel molecule that the carb shares air space with that the throttle body does not? BTW; I'd love to have an engine in my stocker that makes 1.95 per inch that is NHRA factored at .95....should be pretty fast huh?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#64 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 783
Likes: 503
Liked 288 Times in 90 Posts
|
![]()
Interesting question on the air flow.
We have done extensive testing comparing a 780 against the t/b and a carb with and without boosters. Would you believe that a carb without the boosters only flows a single digit increase compared to a 780 with the boosters? . What really helps the 780cfm flow more air than the t/b is that the carb is nearly 3 times the height (counting the air horn) as compared to a 2 inch t/b. The carb, due to its" tunnel design", has the advantage of increased velocity compared to the t/b. This helps in the atomization of the fuel and gives it a "heavy charge" and that results in almost a 30% increase in the flow/velocity for the 780 carb compared to a "dry" T/B. Its really elementary physic's. How'd that sound?? RJ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#65 |
Live Reporter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Dripping Springs, Tx
Posts: 2,709
Likes: 186
Liked 520 Times in 132 Posts
|
![]()
Not being a smart a.. RJ but with you switching to a Mustang doesn't that mean that you will be doing to older cars what you had done to you at Indy? Just saying
Your car is bad fast too!
__________________
Ed Carpenter 2005 Chevy Cobalt A/SM Race Engine Development Last edited by Ed Carpenter; 10-30-2013 at 06:33 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#66 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 783
Likes: 503
Liked 288 Times in 90 Posts
|
![]()
or how about this?
Fuel droplets that are introduced into modified tunnel chambers (carb), actually give the air a friction fighting orgasmic attitude which steadily increases the air speed and flow capabilities of the fuel charge, as opposed to a dry air funnel effect as in the case of an t/b. RJ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#67 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 783
Likes: 503
Liked 288 Times in 90 Posts
|
![]()
Ed.....every chance I get!!
I figure that with the way I drive I will need all the advantages that I can get. Every time I beat an old car I will buy the driver supper and express my deepest apologies . RJ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#68 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 221
Likes: 50
Liked 38 Times in 17 Posts
|
![]()
Actually, you're right. Visibility sucks due to the tiny little quarter window that gets worse when replaced with those louvers. I find the new Camaros to be even worse though.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#69 |
Live Reporter
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New Bern, NC
Posts: 3,467
Likes: 146
Liked 3,363 Times in 731 Posts
|
![]()
That's what I was thinking too.
__________________
James Williamson W200 J/SA. SS/JA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#70 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lake Tapps, Washington
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
RJ;
You are truly a funny guy! Elementary Physics? Heavy charge? Orgasmic? Funny stuff Maynard! The term "butt monkey" comes to mind but a little humor is needed on C/R; Keep up the good work. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|