|
![]() |
#61 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
the simple fix I was referring to was for guys with older cars running newer cars that didn't have a chance taking out heads up runs in in eliminations would give everybody a chance. As for the new cars qualify number one without losing horsepower that will never get changed
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#62 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
why would people spend 150 thousand on a car that is factored just like everyone else's? then you will lose interest from the big 3 manufacturers when nobody is buying any more of those cars
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#63 |
Live Reporter
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New Bern, NC
Posts: 3,467
Likes: 146
Liked 3,363 Times in 731 Posts
|
![]()
No the simple fix is to keep the rules the same for everyone that is the same class, eliminator,etc. I understand they are trying to develop a following for these cars and thats fine, let them have the factory shootouts but dont qualify them on the same sheet with everyone else with seperate rules!
__________________
James Williamson W200 J/SA. SS/JA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#64 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,105
Likes: 1,564
Liked 1,789 Times in 408 Posts
|
![]()
If you want pure bracket racing, then you go pure bracket racing. Converting Stock Eliminator to pure bracket racing is not the solution, and certainly not the solution anyone here is looking for.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#65 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
just as I stated in that post
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#66 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,105
Likes: 1,564
Liked 1,789 Times in 408 Posts
|
![]() Changing the important basic fundamental characteristics of Stock Eliminator does not solve a problem, it merely destroys the class, plain and simple. If you want to bracket race, there are thousands of bracket races for you, have at it, best of luck to you.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#67 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 977
Likes: 792
Liked 275 Times in 76 Posts
|
![]()
What does shoe polish have to do with this topic?
If every car that is competing in the same eliminator does not have to follow the same rules, how is that not going to segregate the racers that compete in Stock? Its the us against them. Clear as night and day. The new cars are cool, no doubt about it, and nothing against the owners either. If there is already a race within a race, then allow the guys not in FS to swing for the fence without a penalty too in the regular race. Not rocket science, same rules apply to all if your car competes in Stock regardless if it is FS or not. If FS competes at 4 national events and no AHFS, it should apply to the non-FS cars too. Sean
__________________
Sean Marconette 84 Mustang 5060 SS/N |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#68 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,220
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#69 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,220
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#70 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: usa
Posts: 752
Likes: 204
Liked 136 Times in 49 Posts
|
![]()
[QUOTE=
I understand why some racers are upset with NHRA and how they are handling the FS class, but there are some good reasons for the no hp. One reason I can tell you is that if they were to give this new class hp, it would take to long to see what the car potential is. These cars are running all out all the time, NHRA now knows what these cars can run. .[/QUOTE] Couldn't they accomplish this same thing by giving them a low index that would take a crazy fast run to hit the -1.00 mark then they can run hard all the time and still follow the rules with the rest of the class. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|