HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-10-2014, 10:45 AM   #71
bert powell
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 243
Likes: 36
Liked 34 Times in 12 Posts
Default Re: HP Adjustments on NHRA.com

Not to mention some of the cars being built completely ignore the rules and are allowed to race. There were pictures on here a while back of a bubble car being built that had a tube chassis with all the floor replaced. Don't remember the name but it is racing now.

Super stock is in my blood but if I was starting from scratch now I would do a 275 car. Cheaper, more races and heads up.
bert powell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2014, 10:56 AM   #72
j gardiner
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: waldorf
Posts: 221
Likes: 14
Liked 55 Times in 29 Posts
Default Re: HP Adjustments on NHRA.com

Even though it is cumbersome I think you have to stick with the system that is in place now which is rating the engine combo and platform individually. There ate to many variables to do it otherwise fwd to rwd, aero, headers, carb to hood clearance etc.
j gardiner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2014, 11:27 AM   #73
Stocker 2
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: HP Adjustments on NHRA.com

Quote:
Originally Posted by bert powell View Post
Not to mention some of the cars being built completely ignore the rules and are allowed to race. There were pictures on here a while back of a bubble car being built that had a tube chassis with all the floor replaced. Don't remember the name but it is racing now.

Super stock is in my blood but if I was starting from scratch now I would do a 275 car. Cheaper, more races and heads up.
After everyone saw those pictures of the floor pan, someone complained to NHRA and the car's floor was replaced with a correct floor pan.
Stocker 2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2014, 11:37 AM   #74
FireSale
VIP Member
 
FireSale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Lakewood Washington
Posts: 1,407
Likes: 29
Liked 237 Times in 126 Posts
Default Re: HP Adjustments on NHRA.com

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stocker 2 View Post
After everyone saw those pictures of the floor pan, someone complained to NHRA and the car's floor was replaced with a correct floor pan.
If we're talking about a Ford build, the tubular bracing was installed above the stock floorpan and covered with sheet aluminum for cosmetic reasons. He left holes for the tech to see the original pan.

Dale
__________________
Dale Shearon
68 Mustang 6394
FireSale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2014, 11:46 AM   #75
Byron Worner
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 231
Likes: 15
Liked 37 Times in 7 Posts
Default Re: HP Adjustments on NHRA.com

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nitro Joe Jackson View Post
in my latest stats only 10 FWD drive cars are are the fastest in the GT classes
hope that 55 chevy doesn't go to fast, he might get his body HP'ed, lol
GT/A … 1837 … Anthony Scinto … '94 Cavalier
GT/B … 356 … David Neal … '05 Sunfire
GT/C … 356 … David Neal … '05 Sunfire
GT/D … 354 … Ernie Neal … '05 Cavalier
GT/E … 5518 … Mark Jenkins … '02 Cavalier
GT/G … 3858 … Dan Jacobs … '05 Cavalier
GT/H … 1473 … Ray Scardelli … '97 Probe
GT/I … 5270 … Tim Nicholson … '67 Chevy II
GT/J … 2134 … Everett Hill … '64 Mustang
GT/K … 3997 … Bill Zaskowski … '66 Chevy II
GT/L … P270 … Rickey Pennington … '81 Malibu
GT/M … 6278 … Michael Parmenter … '55 Chevy
GT/AA … 1108 … Gary Richard … '10 Mustang
GT/BA … 2428 … Andy Fogle … '05 Cavilier
GT/CA … 3028 … Jerry Silveus … '05 Cavalier
GT/DA … 2207 … Jeff Taylor … '10 Cobalt
GT/EA … 1122 … TJ Boucher … '87 Camaro
GT/FA … 1409 … Eric Bardekoff … '68 Barracuda
GT/GA … 318 … Dan Kyle … '87 Firebird
GT/HA … 1140 … Tom Boucher … '85 Pontiac
GT/IA … 1231 … Victor Santos … '85 Firebird
GT/JA … 2619 … Joe Tysinger … '87 Firebird
GT/KA … 2117 … Glen Treadwell … '87 Camaro
GT/LA … 2117 … Glen Tredwell … '87 Camaro
GT/MA … 554 … Ron Roddel … '02 Grand Am
That list is missing a pile of fast FWD cars like Brina Splingaire, Norm Hall, Todd Franz, Mark Nowicki, Dave Layer, Bob Dennis and Irvin Johns. I'm sure I left out a bunch.
Byron Worner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2014, 12:17 PM   #76
Jeff Niceswanger
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 894
Likes: 686
Liked 1,034 Times in 368 Posts
Default Re: HP Adjustments on NHRA.com

Nitro
I'm courious, look up and see how many RWD GT cars won class at Indy last year....That would be a better baromometer than that list you put up...Or look at the qualifying sheet at Indy, that way,they are all on the same track and conditions....Jeff
__________________
Jeff Niceswanger 3740 SS
Jeff Niceswanger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2014, 12:46 PM   #77
Jim Caughlin
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Woodburn, Or
Posts: 685
Likes: 82
Liked 805 Times in 245 Posts
Default Re: HP Adjustments on NHRA.com

I would be hesitant to single out FWD conversion cars for cheating on floorpan rules, there have been numerous photos of conventional SS chassis builds (even on this website) that show blatant floorpan replacement. Have you noticed how low to the ground some of the 60's era cars have gotten? Crawl underneath most 60's era cars with a tape measure and tell me how you legally can get framerails and shocks in place without raising the floorpan? The area between the framerails is getting raised, carpeting does wonders at covering up shiney new non-factory sheetmetal.

Don't get me wrong, I agree that FWD conversion cars have an advantage as far as rules are concerned and every year the rule interpretation seems to be getting a little looser. I didn't build my FWD conversion car that long ago and it's a dinosaur compared to what is being allowed now.

Jim Caughlin
SS 6019
Jim Caughlin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2014, 01:00 PM   #78
SSDiv6
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,044
Likes: 712
Liked 1,585 Times in 582 Posts
Default Re: HP Adjustments on NHRA.com

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Caughlin View Post
I would be hesitant to single out FWD conversion cars for cheating on floorpan rules, there have been numerous photos of conventional SS chassis builds (even on this website) that show blatant floorpan replacement. Have you noticed how low to the ground some of the 60's era cars have gotten? Crawl underneath most 60's era cars with a tape measure and tell me how you legally can get framerails and shocks in place without raising the floorpan? The area between the framerails is getting raised, carpeting does wonders at covering up shiney new non-factory sheetmetal.

Don't get me wrong, I agree that FWD conversion cars have an advantage as far as rules are concerned and every year the rule interpretation seems to be getting a little looser. I didn't build my FWD conversion car that long ago and it's a dinosaur compared to what is being allowed now.

Jim Caughlin
SS 6019
Agree, some of the cars are closer to a Comp Eliminator Super Modified than Super Stock.
SSDiv6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2014, 01:29 PM   #79
Ryan_Haag
Member
 
Ryan_Haag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Seymour, IN
Posts: 114
Likes: 11
Liked 8 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: HP Adjustments on NHRA.com

5 RWD GT cars won class at Indy out of 13 GT classes that had more than one car.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Niceswanger View Post
Nitro
I'm courious, look up and see how many RWD GT cars won class at Indy last year....That would be a better baromometer than that list you put up...Or look at the qualifying sheet at Indy, that way,they are all on the same track and conditions....Jeff
__________________
Ryan Haag
SS/EA 3750
E/SA 3750
Ryan_Haag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2014, 01:35 PM   #80
Jim Caughlin
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Woodburn, Or
Posts: 685
Likes: 82
Liked 805 Times in 245 Posts
Default Re: HP Adjustments on NHRA.com

Actually, I would question if some of the chassis builders even view the spec for a Comp type Super Mod chassis and an SS type Modifed chassis as being any different. I think they are pretty much 'stamping' them out of the same mold...
Jim Caughlin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.