|
|
10-25-2021, 07:19 AM | #1 |
Live Reporter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,281
Likes: 1,637
Liked 9,456 Times in 1,957 Posts
|
Raising Mineshaft Requirements To .95 Under For Stock
It's just a rumor, but if it's true how will that help the AHFS system?
Last edited by Larry Hill; 10-25-2021 at 12:25 PM. |
10-25-2021, 08:59 AM | #2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: The Lowcountry.
Posts: 2,641
Likes: 2,154
Liked 2,082 Times in 769 Posts
|
Re: Raising Mineshaft Requirements To .95 Under For Stock
Larry,
Will this statement also be revised? "This will only apply to qualified fields of 32 or more cars. Automatic changes due to runs of -1.20 or more under the respective index will still count at these events." However, I don't understand how this rumored change effects AHFS. |
10-25-2021, 09:00 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Donaldsonville, LA
Posts: 966
Likes: 8
Liked 183 Times in 62 Posts
|
Re: Raising Mineshaft Requirements To .95 Under For Stock
Will make zero difference other than it will never be mineshaft except for maybe Indy.
__________________
Jimmy "Cooter" Hidalgo, Jr. 4865 E/SA '04 GTO 4865 SS/GA '99 Firebird |
Liked |
10-25-2021, 10:20 AM | #4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,223
Likes: 3,103
Liked 6,791 Times in 1,524 Posts
|
Re: Raising Mineshaft Requirements To .95 Under For Stock
Sorry for the typing but I'm one-handed right now.
The only people that this will affect are the people who don't play the "welfare" game. It won't change anything for those who play the game.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS World's greatest Under-Achiever! |
10-25-2021, 11:15 AM | #5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cumming GA
Posts: 1,928
Likes: 1,071
Liked 1,212 Times in 249 Posts
|
Re: Raising Mineshaft Requirements To .95 Under For Stock
NHRA needs to quit dumbing down the performance side of things for stock and super stock. Why not offer points for qualifying and national records? More heads up runs? Instead, they reduce class and heads up opportunities, and offer no incentive or recognition for records. They don’t support the few tech officials they have. If there is no upside to performance almost everyone will hang back instead of showing what the cars can do when AHFS can make an impact . You would like think a bean counter was running the show….
__________________
James Schaechter 3163 STK Last edited by james schaechter; 10-25-2021 at 11:17 AM. |
10-25-2021, 07:44 PM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Bethany La.
Posts: 318
Likes: 83
Liked 169 Times in 52 Posts
|
Re: Raising Mineshaft Requirements To .95 Under For Stock
Race off national records....... that would shake things up a bit.
__________________
Bill Bogues 4696 STK |
Liked |
10-25-2021, 08:17 PM | #7 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: The Lowcountry.
Posts: 2,641
Likes: 2,154
Liked 2,082 Times in 769 Posts
|
Re: Raising Mineshaft Requirements To .95 Under For Stock
Or let it fly and suspend AHFS for 2 years and let the chips fall where they may.
|
Liked |
|
|