|
10-07-2013, 02:34 PM | #1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Lewiston NY
Posts: 77
Likes: 2
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
85 5.0 Mustangs
What makes the 85 Fox body 5.0 combo so good, that it hold 7 stock records. And why no SA records ?
and where are the 88,89,90s fuel injected Mustangs ? |
10-07-2013, 03:12 PM | #2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Tacoma, Washington
Posts: 1,632
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
|
Re: 85 5.0 Mustangs
Hey Rory,,, you may want to jump in here and enlighten this gentleman regarding this combo,,,my 2 cents.
Danny Durham |
10-07-2013, 03:25 PM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 476
Likes: 1
Liked 275 Times in 25 Posts
|
Re: 85 5.0 Mustangs
Slickfoot, 1985 was the last year of the carburated 5.0 Mustang. It used a Holley 4-barrel carb and are stick only. The automatic version was fuel injected.
|
Liked |
10-07-2013, 03:31 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Rainy Washington
Posts: 584
Likes: 6
Liked 143 Times in 56 Posts
|
Re: 85 5.0 Mustangs
Gary Summers makes this combo look easy, if it was easy everbody would be doing it. Looks like alot of hard work and testing that he does, my hats off to him. Wish my car was that fast. I dont think it is just a stick thing put a good C4 in it, it would still fly. The later fox bodys are easy to get under the index say .5 -.6 undar, but bad *** fast is all cubic dollars on a dyno and parts. Just like any other combo.
|
Liked |
10-07-2013, 05:12 PM | #5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 961
Likes: 661
Liked 182 Times in 62 Posts
|
Re: 85 5.0 Mustangs
Quote:
Sean
__________________
Sean Marconette 84 Mustang 5060 SS/N |
|
Liked |
10-07-2013, 05:14 PM | #6 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Lewiston NY
Posts: 77
Likes: 2
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
Re: 85 5.0 Mustangs
Thanks gentlemen I'm enlightened. I'm building a 89 L/S , comming back into drag racing after 43 years. I better look for a diff. class.
|
10-07-2013, 05:33 PM | #7 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Jersey Shore
Posts: 341
Likes: 1,377
Liked 512 Times in 121 Posts
|
Re: 85 5.0 Mustangs
Quote:
I think the '85 is a good combination also. There have been a handful of them over the years in Stock and SS, and I think that all of them have run well. |
|
Liked |
10-07-2013, 07:03 PM | #8 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Lewiston NY
Posts: 77
Likes: 2
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
Re: 85 5.0 Mustangs
What is a good combo for an 89 stick car , like I said it's been 43years for me . and what do you mean by dime rocket
|
10-07-2013, 07:26 PM | #9 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Jersey Shore
Posts: 341
Likes: 1,377
Liked 512 Times in 121 Posts
|
Re: 85 5.0 Mustangs
Quote:
Anyof the '87-'93 5.0 HO combinations (they're all very similar, if not the same from '87 to '93) are good, either with a stick or an automatic! |
|
10-07-2013, 09:03 PM | #10 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,929
Likes: 100
Liked 329 Times in 117 Posts
|
Re: 85 5.0 Mustangs
Quote:
83-84 CFI 5.0 automatics are way over factored. Too high for that tiny CFI throttle body. 1985 4 bbl Mustang 5.0 combo had the hydraulic roller cam and the heads were better than the 83-84 4 bbl Mustang.
__________________
Alan Mackin Stock 3777/ SS 3377 P/SA & SS/PA Fox Thunderbird I/PS '95 Mustang GT |
|
|
|