|
|
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,501
Likes: 3,603
Liked 7,789 Times in 1,744 Posts
|
![]()
It seems to me that going from a heavy hydraulic roller to a (fairly) light race-type solid roller should do wonders for the RPM potential of a bunch of modern Stockers!
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Glendora,Calif.
Posts: 1,137
Likes: 172
Liked 719 Times in 220 Posts
|
![]()
Seems to me that after a lot of good intelligent questions have surfaced and been discussed, a rule clarification will probably be forthcoming. Yes, Billy, the solid roller lifter comment is a real good probability that RPM's might possibly be affected for good. I know that a mechanical lifter camshaft has clearance ramps included on each end of the lobe configuration to allow for lash, and that the overall lift also compensates for valve train lash. If you tried a set of mechanical lifters on your existent hydraulic cam, what would you use for lash on an initial effort before replacing the cam?We're talking going to a test and tune,not some kind of national event.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: usa
Posts: 239
Likes: 7
Liked 21 Times in 8 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Glendora,Calif.
Posts: 1,137
Likes: 172
Liked 719 Times in 220 Posts
|
![]()
I assume that would have to be at or near operating temperature. Also, how much would you gain over these "Limited Travel" lifters?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 1,084
Liked 184 Times in 113 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 1,084
Liked 184 Times in 113 Posts
|
![]()
Holy Super Stock Batman !!!
Stockers with SOLIDS ! ![]() D |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,941
Likes: 132
Liked 372 Times in 130 Posts
|
![]() One step closer to SS for sure Dan ![]()
__________________
Alan Mackin Stock 3777/ SS 3377 P/SA & SS/PA Fox Thunderbird I/PS '95 Mustang GT |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Greater Boston
Posts: 1,496
Likes: 1,135
Liked 903 Times in 192 Posts
|
![]()
A cottage industry of high tech, high dollar stocker hydraulic lifters is made obsolete overnight by the stroke of a pen...
__________________
Bob Don 128 SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,123
Likes: 1,580
Liked 1,873 Times in 422 Posts
|
![]()
If that is the case, then a lot of stockers are about to gain a lot of RPM, and spend a lot of money. This could get really interesting. Or really stupid. Maybe both.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 64
Liked 780 Times in 194 Posts
|
![]()
Alan, that usually goes hand in hand. It's like the chicken and egg thing.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|