|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 236
Likes: 1,043
Liked 66 Times in 30 Posts
|
![]()
It pains me to say it, but I put my 2010 V-6 Camaro stick car on the scales last summer and with me, a full tank of gas, and an overnight bag on board it weighed 4025#. That puts it at about 3750 without the ballast, which agrees with what I just found online. The SS model is about 150 lbs. more with their bigger brakes, wheels, and added engine weight. And, I've been told that the Challenger is even heavier.
They're fun new cars but they sure aren't lightweights. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
VIP Member
|
![]() Quote:
![]() As for my post from above yours, I will correct myself in that my brochure on the 2010 Challenger didn't have curb weights listed in it afterall. However, what I displayed and what you confirmed with your post showed me that although the Challenger's and Camaro's (sans the factory built race versions) are not lite-weights, they are around the weights of their mid-70's pony car (including the pre-pinto based Mustang) cousins (35-3800lbs). However, even with smaller engines, they could run away and hide from their predecessors on either a drag strip, road coarse, or oval track...thanks to the extra hp they get to enjoy. I hope and pray that you continue to live well, and be able to further enjoy your 2010 Camaro, as I also hope that everyone who reads this that has a car they love will be blessed with the good health (and life) needed to enjoy the mechanical masterpiece that's in their garages (if not at the strip or on the open road)!!! ![]()
__________________
Gary Hampton '86 Z24,173 V6 CF/S #5824 (#78 in 2021) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|