HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Class Racer Builds
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-19-2015, 10:32 AM   #1
HandOverFist
VIP Member
 
HandOverFist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Gulf Breeze, FL
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 8
Liked 33 Times in 16 Posts
Default Re: Ford vs Chevy Build-up

Thanks guys - I won't be going back to the track until all sensors are verified as working. As it stands now the only engine sensors I have installed are the O2's, MAF, BAP, ECT, ATC and TPS...the EGR was deleted and the PCV has been plugged.

Going to the shop shortly to retest the BAP...Brian filled me in last night I should have been probing the battery grd instead of the grd at the harness.
__________________
Rich Taylor
I/SA - 321
HandOverFist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2015, 04:11 PM   #2
HandOverFist
VIP Member
 
HandOverFist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Gulf Breeze, FL
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 8
Liked 33 Times in 16 Posts
Default Re: Ford vs Chevy Build-up

Did some probing today and verified the MAF is working correctly. The BAP sensor problem still plagues me tho...the only sensor that is not functioning. The color code of the wiring in the engine compartment is slightly different from the schematic...it is correct at the ECM termination point however. I don't have a clue where the transition occurs.

Schematic - http://www.veryuseful.com/mustang/te...ng_Diagram.gif

VREF color at the sensor is Brown/White (shows Orange/White on the schematic). It has the correct voltage of 5.07v key on/engine off.

Signal return is Grey/Red (shown as Black/White on the schematic). It has .04v.

BP is Green/Black which is correct all the way and has 2.58v. When I try the Hz scale on the meter it does not move from zero. There is only one scale on this meter for Hz (20K)...wrong scale for this test?

I did a continuity test on the BP wire from the sensor to the ECM connector and it appears solid...I am baffled at this point and don't know what to do next.

There was a 3 bar MAP sensor that came with the PMS and a short jumper attached to the piggyback harness. When I plug the 3 bar in the screen instantly shows it functioning...I can move the reading by applying suction to the port. I don't know if this could be used in lieu of the barometer sensor for this car/computer. Open to any suggestions as I'm totally stumped on this one.

Btw, I did bypass the PMS and went straight to the ECM as a test as well...still no Hz reading, but the engine still fires and runs.
__________________
Rich Taylor
I/SA - 321

Last edited by HandOverFist; 05-19-2015 at 04:22 PM.
HandOverFist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2015, 08:17 PM   #3
tommy d
Senior Member
 
tommy d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Indiana
Posts: 830
Likes: 1,627
Liked 359 Times in 135 Posts
Default Re: Ford vs Chevy Build-up

Rich, this car seems to have taught you some kind of ''new'' language. I don't understand what it is your saying anymore! Bap-Map-Hertz and Diode. You didn't hit your head or something did you?
__________________
Who owns this car, with the peace sign,mag wheels, and four on the floor?
tommy d is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2015, 10:41 PM   #4
Tony Corley
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 264
Likes: 42
Liked 61 Times in 25 Posts
Default Re: Ford vs Chevy Build-up

Rich, here is a good test procedure for your BAP circuit and sensor.


http://sbftech.com/index.php?topic=19336.0
Tony Corley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2015, 01:17 AM   #5
HandOverFist
VIP Member
 
HandOverFist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Gulf Breeze, FL
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 8
Liked 33 Times in 16 Posts
Default Re: Ford vs Chevy Build-up

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony Corley View Post
Rich, here is a good test procedure for your BAP circuit and sensor.


http://sbftech.com/index.php?topic=19336.0
Thanks Tony - I did all the tests except the sensor unplugged portion described in the article...will try that tm. The PMS has a diagnostic that stores fault codes, but it shows none.
__________________
Rich Taylor
I/SA - 321
HandOverFist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2015, 11:45 AM   #6
hutt1
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Portland, Tn
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Ford vs Chevy Build-up

did you look at the procedure to set the distributor at sbftech? if you set the distributor like a crank trigger it will run but not not perform well at all.. I know this sounds very simple to do but if it it installed wrong it will not run fast.. The injectors are fired off the wheel in the distributor . Just a thought after I sold a car that I had a TON of money in and it would not run very fast and I installed the distributor incorrectly.. haha
hutt1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2015, 12:28 PM   #7
HandOverFist
VIP Member
 
HandOverFist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Gulf Breeze, FL
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 8
Liked 33 Times in 16 Posts
Default Re: Ford vs Chevy Build-up

Pretty sure the distributor is in correctly, but I'll eyeball it again.

Alternator due back today and I'm going to stop and pick up two new O2 sensors just for good measure. The recorder for the PMS should arrive tm...I will then be able to log/review runs to do some intelligent tuning.

If all goes as planned I will forgo the TNT Friday at Bowling Green for the SportsNationals and haul the Mustang back to Buffalo Valley Friday evening for some tuning. I'll just roll into BG Saturday morning with the Camaro.
__________________
Rich Taylor
I/SA - 321
HandOverFist is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.