|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Youngsville, N.C.
Posts: 624
Likes: 288
Liked 410 Times in 114 Posts
|
![]()
The combination in this car is the 262/165 which in '75 had to use the tiny 1.09" Venturi 2GC carb. This puts a major challenge with this combo. This is the exact motor I ran in my Monza stocker sans the small carb. As a '76 I was able to run the 1.18 venturi carb such as what Briane Philbrick runs on his in Canada. That .09" difference makes a world of difference in the performance of this tiny V8.
__________________
Joe Huestis "Annie's Song" Racing U/SA 2724 Youngsville, NC |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NS CANADA
Posts: 902
Likes: 1,722
Liked 405 Times in 158 Posts
|
![]()
Thanks Joe, for comparison though, a 302 runs 1.08 and a 351 or 400 ford runs a 1.21....so in relative terms, he ain't so bad! LOL!
Cool stocker though. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,506
Likes: 3,613
Liked 7,865 Times in 1,750 Posts
|
![]()
The air horn on the 2Gs is very small and restrictive not like the motorcraft 2Vs. Big difference.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 2,002
Likes: 64
Liked 783 Times in 195 Posts
|
![]()
Does anyone have REAL flow numbers for 2-bbl carbs?
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NS CANADA
Posts: 902
Likes: 1,722
Liked 405 Times in 158 Posts
|
![]()
This is for the Fords;
Ford 2barrel CFM by venturi size -- .98=190 1.01=240 1.02=245 1.08=287 1.14=300 1.21=351 1.23=356 1.33=424 As most already know 4bbls are rated at 1.5" vacuum and 2bbl's are rated with 3" vacuum. I'd be curious to see what the chev 2bbl's flow. Oh, and this is untouched flow numbers. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 2,002
Likes: 64
Liked 783 Times in 195 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,836
Likes: 2,930
Liked 5,148 Times in 1,965 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
It feeds 45 less cubes though. Less cam, but a bit more compression. 30 hp less , rating wise It ought to run a half second under in decent air with headers, converter and such things maxed out......in my opinion.
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Raleigh NC
Posts: 637
Likes: 27
Liked 254 Times in 78 Posts
|
![]()
Sooooo the new alternator setup worked well, but hard to tell if there was a performance pickup. Ran an 1/8 mile CCRA race and the air was really bad, 90+ degrees and very humid, first really bad air I have run in. One P/SA car that normally runs mid/low 8.0's in reasonable air was running high 8.2's, and I was at 9.56 twice. Took 2 degrees timing out and went slower. So I'm guessing based on the P/SA car I was losing at least .2 which would have put me at 9.36 in reasonable air(9.50 IHRA 1/8). No races coming up and weather is HOT so going to concentrate on header and converter mods for the time being.
Mark, the current headers are Hooker Headers#520-2451(several pics on JEGS) 1 5/8 prim 30" long 3" collector with 18 inches added. I don't think these are totally 'equal length' either. Test was to see if the merge stuff worked on the 'old' headers before I hacked up the hookers. So not going to hack them based on the test. And yes I am going to call Kenny.
__________________
Mike Moller NHRA 203 Q-R-T/SA Last edited by MikeMoller; 06-30-2015 at 04:30 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 2,002
Likes: 64
Liked 783 Times in 195 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Billy's 307 uses a 1.437" throttle bore carb like a 283; the 75 262 uses a 1.686" throttle bore carb like a 305/350. The 72 307 is rated at 171; the 75 262 is rated at 165.
__________________
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,836
Likes: 2,930
Liked 5,148 Times in 1,965 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
My mistake.I though Billy had a 1970 year model. Never looked at it too closely. Should have looked it up on www.classracerinfo.com I stand by whatever's left!
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|