|
|
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texarkana Ark/TX
Posts: 2,446
Likes: 575
Liked 880 Times in 311 Posts
|
![]()
I think it is a move in the right direction by NHRA
I'm 65 and have to pass a class 11 FAA Medical to keep flying. I had no problem with having to get a medical for NHRA. It was just a big hassle. My Dr. never really liked doing the NHRA and the designated FAA Dr./Examiner did not want to do the NHRA. I've always felt there are too many things that hassle the sportsman racer that runs a limited schedule on a strained budget. This could be the first step in releasing the strangle hold on the sportsman's wallet and brings a few of us "Part Timers" back.
__________________
Adger Smith (Former SS) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Jersey
Posts: 359
Likes: 35
Liked 204 Times in 54 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 4,060
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 9 Posts
|
![]()
A nice step in the right direction, although while they're "streamlining" it's still baffling that there exists both a Level 4 and Level 6 license. A vehicle is either 9.99 & quicker / 135+ MPH or its not.
Make all rules based on ET/MPH, and chassis construction. Simple, fair, and consistent. This is not rocket surgery.
__________________
Michael Beard - NHRA/IHRA 3216 S/SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Lakewood Washington
Posts: 1,407
Likes: 29
Liked 237 Times in 126 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Dale
__________________
Dale Shearon 68 Mustang 6394 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 674
Likes: 15
Liked 584 Times in 94 Posts
|
![]()
NHRA had to do something to keep the old guys around and racing. Helps with car counts (ie: entry fees). Next step will be life insurance policies for drivers over 60yrs old included in membership fees. Sanctioning body will be named beneficiary. Good for cash flow!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texarkana Ark/TX
Posts: 2,446
Likes: 575
Liked 880 Times in 311 Posts
|
![]()
LOL, Jim
It wouldn't surprise me. I wonder if one of their bean counters ran the numbers on how many license holders were not current. Then they tried to figure out why. It is a big expense and hassle to go (jump) through a bunch of their "hoops" just to race 3 or 4 events a year. More "Streamlining" is needed
__________________
Adger Smith (Former SS) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Bellevue Ohio
Posts: 984
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times in 8 Posts
|
![]()
Says membership includes "catastrophic insurance, isn't that the 100 dollar insurance every one is required to purchase for a nat. event? Find it hard to believe they would get rid of that cash cow.
__________________
Joe Buchanan SS/BX 3117 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texarkana Ark/TX
Posts: 2,446
Likes: 575
Liked 880 Times in 311 Posts
|
![]()
They might have figured out they needed to renegotiate with the insurance company or move the coverage to another carrier to cut out the surcharge paid at the gate. That was keeping racers away, too. Felt like a gouge...If they didn't they need to. The way it was is membership (Driver) or membership by non driver had a large insurance policy. It was about $350,000 over and above what your own policy paid.
If you had no insurance they became primary. When I had a bad accident running IHRA my personal insurance took a hike. My IHRA membership insurance Wisenberg (IHRA Ins.) spent around $238,000 on my care and rebuild.. I don't think the membership insurance applies to anything but the member. Time will tell what is going on.
__________________
Adger Smith (Former SS) Last edited by Adger Smith; 11-17-2015 at 04:45 PM. Reason: sp |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|