|
![]() |
#31 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,486
Likes: 3,587
Liked 7,683 Times in 1,731 Posts
|
![]()
This is a perfect example of the purpose that this letter will (hopefully) serve! There are hundreds of combos in the guide that haven't been competitive in years or have never been. Why should NHRA overlook these combos?
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,763
Likes: 1,197
Liked 1,954 Times in 491 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]()
In 1962 mfgrs were inflating hp numbers to sell cars. No way that engine ever made near the power later 425hp engines make.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 1,999
Likes: 64
Liked 772 Times in 192 Posts
|
![]()
Seven Liters (427 cubic inches) and 425 hp was the pinnacle for advertising for several years in the 1960s. Comparing a '63 409-425hp, a '63 Ford 427-425hp, a Pontiac 421-420hp, or a '62 MoPar 413-420hp in their original form to the later Hemis, High Rise Fords, or Chev L72/L88/ZL1, you know that something is just not right with the ratings.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#35 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,809
Likes: 2,900
Liked 5,114 Times in 1,948 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
The 63 was 425, with not much difference in specs, if any. There's a perfect example for Dwight's previous post . The 62 has been reduced through the current system, but nowhere near enough. The single 4 , 380 /365 hp needs about 65 more off it ,with that small carburetor.
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#36 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 11
Likes: 4
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
Not real computer savy that is why I never log on. I to have raced stock for over 40 years on a very limited budget. Haven't race since 2007 when my son passed. Why not do away with the heads up race except for when the exact same combo is pair. You may get a few more racers that way. I know there are a lot of fast D E F & G combos that I certainly can't compete against. Not wanting to start an argument just want to help e little guys.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#37 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,937
Likes: 131
Liked 369 Times in 127 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Alan Mackin Stock 3777/ SS 3377 P/SA & SS/PA Fox Thunderbird I/PS '95 Mustang GT |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#38 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Houma, LA
Posts: 2,717
Likes: 2
Liked 325 Times in 50 Posts
|
![]()
A few years ago I really tried to get 10% off of I think 1995 or so back, and 5 % off the inbetween motors LT1, LS1 and a couple more, and nothing for 2008 or newer. After getting severely scolded by old car guys for various reasons (my favorite "We will got fast and then get hit with HP") I cancelled that project, and had a couple of beverages. I thought I was trying to help. Many disagreed.
__________________
Jeff Teuton 4022 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#39 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 1,999
Likes: 64
Liked 772 Times in 192 Posts
|
![]()
Jeff, we all know you are a hero.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#40 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Wilson NC
Posts: 106
Likes: 309
Liked 52 Times in 9 Posts
|
![]()
The NHRA Technical Department recently made changes to the Class Guide.
1977 Buick Regal 350 170/287 change to 350 170/270 1977 Chev Chevelle 350 170/287 change to 350 170/270 auto 1977 Chev Chevelle 350 170 270 change to 350 170/275 man 1970 Dodge Challenger 440 390/400 change to 440 390/382 1964 Mopar 330, Savoy 426 425/415 change to 426 425/405 looks like letter is working for some
__________________
Jim Morgan 1916 , 9916 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|