|
|
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Liberty City [East Texas]
Posts: 1,760
Likes: 5
Liked 99 Times in 60 Posts
|
![]()
352,
you will need to experiment. There is to reason to carry extra weight if it is not needed. And about a lower powered four-link. I thank it is always OK to have a four-link no matter the power level. With your reference to Cal-Tracks, the geometry of that is very much like a four-link. The spring front attachment being the upper bar point and the Cal-Track the lower bar point where those two lines would cross.
__________________
Larry Woodfin 471W |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 17
Likes: 1
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
My son's 385 is only around 550HP. He has a best of 1.36, 60 foot and 6.36, 1/8 mile. He ran 10.22/131 in Topeka. His truck is 2850 lbs with him in it. That's with 4.86 rear and 13.5 x 29.5 tires.
The truck is 59% front and 41% rear. Only 5 gallon fuel cell and12 volt red top battery in the back of the bed. We are switching to 5.14's and 13.5/31 tires. Our local track is usually a little iffy,so just putting a little more rubber under it. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]()
Duke, Nice picture. I like what I am hearing on the percentage weight front to rear. I am also curious on how much pre-load is being run. I am sure a lot of people have put them on 4 corner scales.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|