|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Live Reporter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,650
Likes: 1,942
Liked 10,766 Times in 2,238 Posts
|
![]()
The center-line of the crank pin is moved .0065 away from center-line of mains. If stroke on stock crank is 3.483'' instead 3.480'' and the pin is on the high side of tolerance it will make a stroke of 3.493'' grinding it .010'' under to the low side. But usually it takes a .030'' under on the rods to get .013'' stroke. If the index is good why not make it .014'' long?
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Hampden, MA
Posts: 1,202
Likes: 233
Liked 797 Times in 165 Posts
|
![]()
Larry has it correct , it is a math exercise. The one thing that you also must realize is that indexing can not be fixed much by grinding. As an example, a 3" stroke crank would take a move of .026 for each degree it is off. to move it that much, it would need to be ground a minimum of .052 under.
__________________
Dave Casey 1330 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#3 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]()
Would you then have the rod journals chrome plated to build back to a std bearing? Or some other method. And would it be worth offsetting to a shorter stroke, if allowable to gain piston to valve clearance so as not to sink the valve job,in a piston without valve reliefs?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Monroe Twp NJ
Posts: 507
Likes: 1,042
Liked 1,001 Times in 276 Posts
|
![]()
I never heard of anyone hard chroming a crankshaft to bring up a surface thickness. I thought it was like nitriding, to give a harder surface so the bearings doesn't bite into the journal.
__________________
Duane Hoven 1342 SS/GT Last edited by 1347; 06-22-2019 at 12:58 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]()
Maybe for both.About ten years ago I had picked up a crank from a still active today Stock/super stock mopar racer and it was offset ground and hard chromed journals to standard bearing size.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Las Vegas nv
Posts: 600
Likes: 18
Liked 66 Times in 37 Posts
|
![]()
I once did a back to back on a bracket car. 355 vs 383 sbc everything equal. 355 ran 6.80 - 383 ran 6.80. 1/4" made no difference.
__________________
72 cutlass |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Elysburg, Pa
Posts: 733
Likes: 361
Liked 327 Times in 121 Posts
|
![]()
I did that in 74 with a 426 street wedge and a 383, same heads, cam, carb and the 383 Torker instead of the 440 Tarantula, the 383 was used after I spun a bearing in the 426 so I could still bracket race every week while I built a new engine. The 383 had almost a point less comp. and about 80k miles on the shortblock, it ran within a tenth and a mph of the average of the 426.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|