|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]()
Maybe for both.About ten years ago I had picked up a crank from a still active today Stock/super stock mopar racer and it was offset ground and hard chromed journals to standard bearing size.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Las Vegas nv
Posts: 600
Likes: 18
Liked 66 Times in 37 Posts
|
![]()
I once did a back to back on a bracket car. 355 vs 383 sbc everything equal. 355 ran 6.80 - 383 ran 6.80. 1/4" made no difference.
__________________
72 cutlass |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Elysburg, Pa
Posts: 733
Likes: 361
Liked 327 Times in 121 Posts
|
![]()
I did that in 74 with a 426 street wedge and a 383, same heads, cam, carb and the 383 Torker instead of the 440 Tarantula, the 383 was used after I spun a bearing in the 426 so I could still bracket race every week while I built a new engine. The 383 had almost a point less comp. and about 80k miles on the shortblock, it ran within a tenth and a mph of the average of the 426.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 103
Likes: 79
Liked 12 Times in 6 Posts
|
![]()
You can weld and regrind the journals to get the stroke you want and keep the standard size. Also we were chroming crank journals back in the sixties.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texarkana Ark/TX
Posts: 2,446
Likes: 575
Liked 880 Times in 311 Posts
|
![]()
Take it to a smaller journal size.2.100 to 2" Ect..
I have built many BBC with a 2.100 J instead of 2.2
__________________
Adger Smith (Former SS) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Boulder City, Nevada 89005
Posts: 2,736
Likes: 2,808
Liked 2,488 Times in 698 Posts
|
![]()
The .013 Offset only adds a very small amount of displacement!
__________________
John Irving 741 Stock 741 Super Stock Last edited by GTX JOHN; 07-06-2019 at 12:08 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Verrry South Jersey
Posts: 537
Likes: 134
Liked 251 Times in 125 Posts
|
![]()
Anyone know the origin or purpose of the .013 rule? (Is it actually .015, .002 to be safe?)
As John implied, the small amount of cubic inches (inch?) gained seems, even though every little bit counts, hardly worth it, unless there's an ulterior motive. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 1,084
Liked 184 Times in 113 Posts
|
![]()
The impact is a bit more compression from the added stroke.
Draws .013 more air and then compresses .013 a differential of .026 Plus slightly smaller diameter crank diameter, less parasitic drag. Most engines it is about 1.5 cuin increase. Last edited by Dan Fahey; 07-08-2019 at 12:45 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|