'94-'96 GM B-body 260/299 LT1 350 sedan or wagon stocker? - Page 4

6130 · 08-07-2021, 06:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeff Stout

Az Classic car site on facebook has a 92 Chevy Wagon, running driving with lt1 for 2800. Car looks pretty good.

The LT1 wasn't introduced until 1994.

A lot of booger-eating crystal meth tweakers advertise their TBI 305 or 350 '91-'93 B-body GM cars as being "LT1" equipped.

They are among the same demographic that tends to refer to aftermarket wheels using the words "custom" and "rims"...

6130 · 08-07-2021, 07:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark Yacavone

Sounds like you're doing your homework..That's good.
Just be careful who you listen to..This won't be a pure stocker.
OD trans planetaries and clutches and LU converters have no business in a good K/SA car. You'll leave too much ET on the table.
I think you already know that. ;-)

Copy that...

Pierce Jones · 08-07-2021, 08:24 PM

only one problem with this combo .... no stick

Dan Fahey · 08-08-2021, 08:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark Yacavone

Sounds like you're doing your homework..That's good.
Just be careful who you listen to..This won't be a pure stocker.
OD trans planetaries and clutches and LU converters have no business in a good K/SA car. You'll leave too much ET on the table.
I think you already know that. ;-)

You do if you want a reliable trouble free trans in a heavy car that will Last.
Btw last year my F/Pure Stocker was 18th under the Index on the list at Numidia.

Bet you you have something to say..!
Here it comes !

Lee Valentine · 08-09-2021, 06:24 AM

I believe he's trying to go fast not.18 under
Listen to Mark and get with the program. A good th-350 or 200 will be 4-5 tenths faster. It's not just about first gear ratio. You can make up for the ratio with the correct converter.

6130 · 08-09-2021, 04:05 PM

Yeah, I'm not trying to set a national record, but I would not be stoked with .18 under.

Mark Yacavone · 08-09-2021, 07:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dan Fahey

You do if you want a reliable trouble free trans in a heavy car that will Last.
Btw last year my F/Pure Stocker was 18th under the Index on the list at Numidia.

Bet you you have something to say..!
Here it comes !

Did you guys happen to see Jason Line mention his 200 trans?

No further comment here...

Hacksaw · 08-10-2021, 08:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 6130

Yeah, I'm not trying to set a national record, but I would not be stoked with .18 under.

I took it as number 18 on the list, not .18 under his index.

08-07-2021, 08:24 PM	#33
Pierce Jones Junior Member Join Date: Aug 2013 Location: Chatham, ON. Canada Posts: 19 Likes: 15 Liked 15 Times in 9 Posts	Re: '94-'96 GM B-body 260/299 LT1 350 sedan or wagon stocker only one problem with this combo .... no stick __________________ Pierce Jones 1995 Camaro D/S #3102

08-09-2021, 06:24 AM	#35
Lee Valentine Senior Member Join Date: May 2004 Location: Brookfield, CT Posts: 708 Likes: 13 Liked 322 Times in 68 Posts	Re: '94-'96 GM B-body 260/299 LT1 350 sedan or wagon stocker I believe he's trying to go fast not.18 under Listen to Mark and get with the program. A good th-350 or 200 will be 4-5 tenths faster. It's not just about first gear ratio. You can make up for the ratio with the correct converter. __________________ Lee Valentine 1661 STK

08-09-2021, 04:05 PM	#36
6130 Member Join Date: Jul 2012 Location: Texas Posts: 409 Likes: 295 Liked 117 Times in 50 Posts	Re: '94-'96 GM B-body 260/299 LT1 350 sedan or wagon stocker Yeah, I'm not trying to set a national record, but I would not be stoked with .18 under.