|
![]() |
#11 | |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 274
Likes: 98
Liked 48 Times in 44 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Recall the other thread, we just went over the NHRA Factors: 385hp RA2 380hp RA4 Not what I would've guessed: It would seem the RA4 would make more power: * New heads - better intake port or so I read * Aluminum intake - you'd think better than iron but I've read both * Rockers - same cam but 1.65 RR vs the RA2's 1.50 RR For me, that Gonkulates the RA4 to make 20-25hp more than the RA2. And yet, NHRA factored the RA4 at 5hp LESS than the RA2. Did they really run that way (ie about the same)? The fastest RA2 car I have from back then is Fields 119.52mph record, RA2 4spd Firebird, June 1971 Compared to the fastest RA4 car 114.79mph record, RA4 auto GTO, Nemesis, May 1970 Of course you then have to correct the GTO for its weight (200 lb ~ 2mph) and being an auto trans (trap speeds about 2mph lower) So make it 118.79mph for what we've converted to a "68 Firebird 4spd RA4". A more accurate conversion gives 118.95mph. So 119.52mph best RA2 118.95mph best RA4 Given how sparse that old data is, I'd call that "the same", which jives with NHRA factoring the RA2=385 and RA4=380, ie "the same". I looked in my modern NHRA class files, a couple years old. For stock class RA2=335-340, RA4=345 in the Firebird RA2=365, RA4=365 in the GTO So, within the strangeness of modern factoring, the RA2 and RA4 are still factored "about the same". It's more a function of the body than the engine. I wondered, what is your feeling over the years, are the RA2 & RA4 about the same power or is one stronger (in the same weight car!)? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|