|
|
![]() |
#1 | ||
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,829
Likes: 2,183
Liked 2,361 Times in 558 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Daren Poole-Adams NHRA Stock/SS 2007 |
||
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#2 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 628
Likes: 318
Liked 705 Times in 204 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Mike 7570 A/SA Last edited by Mike Gray; 01-07-2023 at 01:58 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#3 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,829
Likes: 2,183
Liked 2,361 Times in 558 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
It is probably the most consistent COPO that I own. The throttle body is the same one that's on my 302. The cylinder heads are the same castings as the 396/375. I have a pretty good idea of how Chevrolet's test session went. I also have my own data. I ordered the car with the understanding that the HP would be 430. The 500 HP rating that the combination was given is a big disappointment to us. As delivered, the 572 made just a little over 720 HP on Jeff's engine dyno. My 302 made right around 600 HP on Holley's when I lent it to them to test the Terminator X. I have no doubt that there is room to pick the combination up. We are experimenting with some stuff right now. I just can't bring myself to throw a big pile of money at this car.
__________________
Daren Poole-Adams NHRA Stock/SS 2007 Last edited by GUMP; 01-07-2023 at 09:45 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#4 |
Live Reporter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,671
Likes: 1,987
Liked 10,911 Times in 2,256 Posts
|
![]()
My '15 DP 392 is rated at 430.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,829
Likes: 2,183
Liked 2,361 Times in 558 Posts
|
![]()
Yes, and it will outrun my 572 all day long....
__________________
Daren Poole-Adams NHRA Stock/SS 2007 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 706
Likes: 128
Liked 508 Times in 92 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,829
Likes: 2,183
Liked 2,361 Times in 558 Posts
|
![]()
It has a 2.48 first and 4.11 rear. The stock tune hits the rev limiter before the mph clocks.
__________________
Daren Poole-Adams NHRA Stock/SS 2007 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 267
Likes: 1,199
Liked 355 Times in 80 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#9 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,829
Likes: 2,183
Liked 2,361 Times in 558 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
The ZL1 was not "dragstrip ready" as delivered. Do those modifications and it ran A LOT better. Add 50+ years of rule changes and it's rated only 15 HP above the factory rating. Do you have dyno numbers that you can share on that combination? It was competitive in 1969 with very few modifications and I believe it's still competitive at it's current rating?
__________________
Daren Poole-Adams NHRA Stock/SS 2007 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Thibodaux, LA
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 336
Liked 1,074 Times in 227 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Come now! I saw that combo go 8.7’s in SS trim with my own eyes!
__________________
Brett Candies 4192 Stock/SS God Bless America |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
|
|