|
|
View Poll Results: Yay or Nay | |||
This is a net good |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
80 | 47.06% |
This is a net bad |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
43 | 25.29% |
Don't care, I'm going to stay in my lane |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
47 | 27.65% |
Voters: 170. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#31 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: from Vancouver BC Canada, now in Nova Scotia
Posts: 1,309
Likes: 313
Liked 1,097 Times in 300 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
NHRA 6390 STK M/S 85 Mustang |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 913
Likes: 1,124
Liked 679 Times in 202 Posts
|
![]()
With the cars standard production weight of approximately 3400 lbs and a predicted hp rating at 325, I predict it will be a D, E and F class car. Now, if the car comes in at a lighter weight, which it should with the ability to remove all the emission equipment, wiring, etc., it could land as C, D or E. Turbo engines can make more power than you would expect, fun to see where it lands. Bets anyone!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2024
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 553
Likes: 1,569
Liked 1,155 Times in 324 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Dawson Pauley #2827 N/SA 1980 Malibu SW 2S 305/180 #2827 S/ST 1978 Mazda RX7 w/ 383 sbc/glide |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2024
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 553
Likes: 1,569
Liked 1,155 Times in 324 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Dawson Pauley #2827 N/SA 1980 Malibu SW 2S 305/180 #2827 S/ST 1978 Mazda RX7 w/ 383 sbc/glide |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: tomsriver nj
Posts: 477
Likes: 72
Liked 213 Times in 85 Posts
|
![]()
Good luck at Indy with it . The GTO and the 340 cars in D & E/SA might be in for a surprise.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 22
Likes: 129
Liked 56 Times in 12 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#37 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Las Vegas, Nv
Posts: 860
Likes: 260
Liked 1,313 Times in 401 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Paul H |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#38 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,817
Likes: 2,146
Liked 2,326 Times in 546 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Due to standards that didn't exist in "The Way Back" the HP numbers that the manufacturers publish are much more honest than in the past. That would make them less than competetive in the world of NHRA Stock/SS racing.
__________________
Daren Poole-Adams NHRA Stock/SS 2007 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#39 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 22
Likes: 129
Liked 56 Times in 12 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Daren, thank you for the response to my question. I think what you are doing in terms of adding an exciting new car/combination to Stock Eliminator is a good thing and your hard work should be commended. However, one does not have to look back too far to see the results of what I believe is over generous NHRA HP ratings related to new cars/combinations. For example, 2010 INDY; 11 of the top 16 qualifiers were 2008-2010 entries. 2011 INDY; all top 16 qualifiers were 2008-2011 entries. In my opinion, new cars/combinations in Stock Eliminator should be competitive, but they should not be dominating classes full of previous top qualifiers that have been flogging out there combinations for the past 20+ years. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#40 |
Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 102
Likes: 6
Liked 87 Times in 28 Posts
|
![]()
When classified by hp vs weight, body aerodynamics can be an advantage, old vs new.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
|
|