|
05-22-2009, 10:37 PM | #1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 68
Likes: 8
Liked 9 Times in 2 Posts
|
Sorenson's 1.408 under decision
Since the thread Whither the 425/427 got hi jacked I will start it fresh. Bill Dedman is correct when he posted "this is not rocket science". The rule is simple, You go 1.40 under you get hit period.
The people that witnessed the Sorenson scaling incident which really should have no bearing on whether the combo gets hit or not, have been contacted by at least 2 NHRA people and asked to put what they saw in writing. They have agreed to do so and have been told this issue isn't over by any means. My opinion for what it is worth, is for some unknown reason the big NHRA broom has come out of the closet, the carpet lifted, and in one sweep it has all disappeared. It has become quite obvious that the 1.40 under rule only applies to those that NHRA wants it to apply to. If I were Fred Hensen, Frank Grossi or anybody else that got hit with 3.25 % HP I would be HOT and in somebody's face. Dave Schmitz |
05-22-2009, 10:46 PM | #2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Conway, AR
Posts: 1,739
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
|
Re: Sorenson's 1.408 under decision
Dave, just think, if you'd had a Chevy all those years..... LOL! How different your life could have been!!!
You probably don't remember me, but I lived in Hayward from 1980 'til 2004 and watched your E-Body car a lot at Fremont, Sac., Sears Point etc.... I hung around Hollums' shop with Len Schneider and MIke Loge a lot.... you and I met a time or two, but that was 25+ years ago... fat guy with a white beard (ME, not you).... worked for the Chronicle. Anyway, thanks for the info.... I can see Fast Freddy's lawyers lining up the paperwork as we speak... LOL!
__________________
Bill Last edited by bill dedman; 05-22-2009 at 11:28 PM. |
05-22-2009, 11:22 PM | #3 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 68
Likes: 8
Liked 9 Times in 2 Posts
|
Re: Sorensen's 1.408 under decision
We came oh so close to building a 427 Camaro. But we had all the parts from the 65 Hemi car that Butch Leal bought from us and all we had to do was change the pistons, cam and use cast iron heads and we were done. Don little is still the only guy I know that can make that street hemi run. Hensens motor proves that.
Yes I do remember you even though it was a long time ago. I see Sorensen is running the divisional at Mission. (talk about a fast track) It looks like Joe is back behind the wheel again. Can't believe NHRA hasn't acted on this yet. Dave Schmitz |
05-25-2009, 07:29 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Pierce NE
Posts: 901
Likes: 51
Liked 303 Times in 106 Posts
|
Re: Sorenson's 1.408 under decision
In talking to my div tech director this how it is no nhra person saw what happened so no hp hit. However new langauge is beinng writen as far as 1.40 under. Kind of closeing the barn door after the horse got out. So untill we see somthing in writing the matter is dead. I think his veiw was it has to be seen by someone from nhra and it is ilegal to take out wieght of taint a fuel sample to void a run. I also found out the hard way that only Nal event runs count for ahfs averages. On fri before teching in I asked the div tech director and div director if div runs counted on the average and was told yes then after my fist run on sat I was told that they had called Cal and now it was nal only so much for that.So now with so few cars in the average there maybe a lot of hp given out unless you had your car painted in Cal. Tom Meyer
__________________
Tom Meyer 5240 SS Stock ??? |
05-25-2009, 08:31 AM | #5 |
Live Reporter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,314
Likes: 1,669
Liked 9,550 Times in 1,982 Posts
|
Re: Sorenson's 1.408 under decision
Sorenson's car sure has lost a lot of its luster!!!! His car will still beat mine in a heads-up run every time, but it won't mean as much as it did before Boisie.
Last edited by Larry Hill; 05-25-2009 at 08:35 AM. |
05-25-2009, 09:17 AM | #6 | |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Sorenson's 1.408 under decision
Quote:
p.s. Why didn't he get the Record?was the other runs too far apart and the slower ET over current Record? |
|
05-25-2009, 09:41 AM | #7 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 389 Times in 168 Posts
|
Re: Sorenson's 1.408 under decision
Quote:
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
|
05-25-2009, 10:14 AM | #8 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: chewelah wa
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times in 4 Posts
|
Re: Sorenson's 1.408 under decision
WHAT happened to kevin cours post on this matter?
__________________
larry dowty 6388 SS |
05-25-2009, 10:15 AM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Pierce NE
Posts: 901
Likes: 51
Liked 303 Times in 106 Posts
|
Re: Sorenson's 1.408 under decision
Thats my take on it Ed. It is now a three person board Bruce Danny and I can not rember the other so like I said maybe you need your car painted in Cal. Tom
__________________
Tom Meyer 5240 SS Stock ??? |
05-25-2009, 12:06 PM | #10 |
Live Reporter
|
Re: Sorenson's 1.408 under decision
Tom -- I don't agree with your anology as I'm probably one of the few on this board who has had his car painted in California and it hasn't helped me over the years one bit -- not one little bit .. ever......
PS-- I really hate to admit it but I got some very nice paint work .
__________________
Jack Matyas 1547 FS/C 2015 Camaro COPO # 62- 2012 Camaro Convertible COPO |
|
|