Re: Submit 2014 Rule Change Requests
Ed,
Most are correctly factored for 1,000 ft. The trouble starts when they run to 1320. Dennis Breeden |
Re: Submit 2014 Rule Change Requests
I think everyone should stay on topic and address your issues to Bruce as Travis said. Bruce is a very methodic person and will analyze and share all of the concerns and talk with all members of the committee. Bruce used to race and knows the problems. He can't solve everything but will give an HONEST attempt for all concerned.
|
Re: Submit 2014 Rule Change Requests
Quote:
|
Re: Submit 2014 Rule Change Requests
Quote:
My post was merely meant to be a nudge to keep the thread about Travis' reminder to us, rather than have it go off in another direction. As far as a rule for racers to suggest to make it fair, let's just say that's better off with a thread of its own, which will not be pretty, they've all turned ugly since those cars were put in the guide. |
Re: Submit 2014 Rule Change Requests
Do you think the belt manufactures would keep the same price to re-cert or just ad more for having a longer cert? What would we gain?
|
Re: Submit 2014 Rule Change Requests
How about changing the ahfs so that it reviews after the 6th 12th 18th and final event... That will speed up the process
|
Re: Submit 2014 Rule Change Requests
Quote:
|
Re: Submit 2014 Rule Change Requests
Good idea on AHFS. I think atleast 3 review periods would be good but 4 may even be better.
|
Re: Submit 2014 Rule Change Requests
I agree. Four would be even better.
|
Re: Submit 2014 Rule Change Requests
originally it was 3 times, but later changed to 2. I have proposed for the umpthteen time to make it a system of averages and quit mixing a dynamic eliminator with static numbers. Not a good match. We shall see.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:33 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.