Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Yacavone
I agree with Robert about one thing. It all depends on how you're looking at the tree. That's why I don't stay up nights worrying about redlighting first.
On the other hand , I don't see any reason to not fix it, in this day and age.
Oh yes I do . It might help out a slower car once in a while. Just look at who's usually against this change.
"I need wheelie bars. I can't leave hard enough on the last bulb without them"
OK, no problem . Here ya' go. You slower cars can have them too.
"I don't like that deep staging thing. It might give a slower leaving car some flexibility in leaving on the last bulb"
Ok, let's take a poll. Guess what? There's more fast cars around now. Look who wins? Imagine that.
"I can't win class at Indy with my new A-B-C fi car. Help me out. Change that 40 year old rule."
OK, no problem. Let's take a poll. Guess what ? There's more class losers with 10 second cars nowadays . Look who wins this one?
to be continued...
|
I think this post shows that people with nothing better to do will just keep on asking for changes..it has changed to much and to fast the last ten years..the first red light rule has cons and pro's...It will not change anything in the end...but just be another "Change" ..dual redlights where the first car did not drag the other car along isn't that many..and the cases were the slower cars in that scenario is the winner is even fewer...just a another way for a "redlight looser" to get back in the race as i see it..DONT REDLIGHT..put the pressure on the other guy...if you have problems with redlights you wont win anything anyway...so change that manner instead!