Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed Fernandez
The thread is a load of ****.Over 50 posts for a non issue.It's quite simple,you go green and race to the end.You go red and you lose.It's a 50/50 deal in the end on a red light.We have way more important issues of inequities in S/SS racing.Top of the list is PAYOUTS.Nobody is getting any momentum out of wanting better payouts down the line.A bracket racer gets more mileage out of crying for social justice for the "poor" slow guys who get the 1st chance to go red.
Someone start a pole to see how M cars and down feel we need a bracket racer to determine if the rule should be changed.
I can't wait to see what Crusader Rabbit's next campaign will be.
|
Ed ,The fact of the matter is changes to the basic timing system affect way more than S/SS cars.
The 5 amber tree was changed to three, because supposedly it sped up the completion of National event on schedule. You notice it is now standard across the country.
Myself, I liked the 5 amber tree back in the 80's, with a stick shift FWD car. I had to learn to deal with the 3 amber deal.
NHRA and IHRA are going to do whatever they think is right for the sport in the long run, no matter what a couple of part time Stocker racers like you and I, think about it.
If the first red light loser becomes the worst r/l loser some time in the future, you 'll just have to deal with that too.
If you go red and then are awarded a win slip, the security folks will probably have to come and drag you back to the lanes for the next round, right?