View Single Post
Old 01-18-2010, 11:11 PM   #30
Jeff Lee
VIP Member
 
Jeff Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anthem, Arizona
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: Clutchless trans

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Dahl View Post
I agree with Jeff that NHRA should combine the sticks and autos. I have raced both sticks and autos and clearly there is an unfair advantage for someone who is allowed to launch their car with the release of a button versus the movement of the foot. If there is a debate I would suggest observing what happens when someone gets caught using a transbrake in a "foot brake" class.

As well, and for what it's worth, take a look at the horsepower ratings since the advent of the AHFS. The autos are having horsepower added and for the most part sticks are not. Why? Because the index penalty for having a stick is unequivocally outdated when you consider radial tires, modern three speed transmissions, and the benefit of a 5 to 1 ratio of automatic cars versus stick cars flogging their combinations. I think it's time to consolidate the classes.
Exactly. I can't find any valid reason (today, not twenty years ago) that the index spreads are as much as two tenths apart. I don't care how it's cut, split the difference, go to the top or go to the bottom numbers, as Mike stated, the auto trans racers have covered a lot of ground and there is no longer a need to have a spread. And if that's the case, put 'em all together.
Heads up runs are what I and the fans crave. Less classes is what NHRA wants and the same with sponsors. Pinks all out is popular for a reason!

Ed,
SS/H '70 AMX = 315 x 9.5 + 170 = 3160
__________________
Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX
Jeff Lee is offline   Reply With Quote