Clutchless trans

Mike Dahl · 01-18-2010, 01:35 PM

I agree with Jeff that NHRA should combine the sticks and autos. I have raced both sticks and autos and clearly there is an unfair advantage for someone who is allowed to launch their car with the release of a button versus the movement of the foot. If there is a debate I would suggest observing what happens when someone gets caught using a transbrake in a "foot brake" class.

As well, and for what it's worth, take a look at the horsepower ratings since the advent of the AHFS. The autos are having horsepower added and for the most part sticks are not. Why? Because the index penalty for having a stick is unequivocally outdated when you consider radial tires, modern three speed transmissions, and the benefit of a 5 to 1 ratio of automatic cars versus stick cars flogging their combinations. I think it's time to consolidate the classes.

01-18-2010, 01:35 PM	#24
Mike Dahl Junior Member Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Las Vegas Posts: 30 Likes: 0 Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts	Re: Clutchless trans I agree with Jeff that NHRA should combine the sticks and autos. I have raced both sticks and autos and clearly there is an unfair advantage for someone who is allowed to launch their car with the release of a button versus the movement of the foot. If there is a debate I would suggest observing what happens when someone gets caught using a transbrake in a "foot brake" class. As well, and for what it's worth, take a look at the horsepower ratings since the advent of the AHFS. The autos are having horsepower added and for the most part sticks are not. Why? Because the index penalty for having a stick is unequivocally outdated when you consider radial tires, modern three speed transmissions, and the benefit of a 5 to 1 ratio of automatic cars versus stick cars flogging their combinations. I think it's time to consolidate the classes. Last edited by Mike Dahl; 01-18-2010 at 05:13 PM.