View Single Post
Old 12-15-2012, 08:42 PM   #377
Andrew Hill
Senior Member
 
Andrew Hill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 701
Likes: 446
Liked 174 Times in 39 Posts
Default Re: GM Releases 2013 bogus HP ratings at PRI show

Quote:
Originally Posted by GUMP View Post
As far as the 427/425 combination goes. I would suggest that as delivered the number is pretty fair. I think that you can get quite a lot more out of it but it will take work and money just like any other combination.
The number as delivered is fair? So because it will only run 1.10 under from the factory it's not underfactored? You put a 3 speed and converter in one and go 1.40 under without taking a valve cover off! I don't care what kind of car it is, that shouldn't be possible.

Honestly, I would get no sense of accomplishment qualifying at the top of the sheet at 1.00-1.10 under in one of these cars. Now, if you build one right and run it hard, that's good. Some people are doing that with the new cars, and I respect that, but there are all sorts who aren't.

As far as not running my car out and getting horsepower, it would be crazy to do so. I don't have the luxury of outrunning my competition by multiple tenths where won't matter if I move up a class or two. If I go 1.10 under a couple times this spring, then go to Columbus in July, and run Randi Lynn heads up spotting her 70 lbs? No thank you.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Charley Downing
Can the same ten guys just shut the F*** up for one day about old vs new and under factored combos. You ***** clowns are like little kids, just shut up. Its not even fun screwing with you guys anymore.
You may not have fun screwing with us anymore, but I damn sure enjoy screwing with you!
__________________
3207 D/SA, C/ED
Andrew Hill is offline   Reply With Quote