|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 205
Likes: 48
Liked 68 Times in 22 Posts
|
![]()
What is preferred rear gear in a lt1 camaro. What is rpm difference between 4.88 and 5.14. How much would mph change. Not looking for answers from a calculation but from some people with experience with lt1 combo.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,817
Likes: 2,149
Liked 2,336 Times in 549 Posts
|
![]()
What class?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 205
Likes: 48
Liked 68 Times in 22 Posts
|
![]()
B,c/sa
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,817
Likes: 2,149
Liked 2,336 Times in 549 Posts
|
![]()
I would run the 4.88. I never saw any gains from running more gear with an LT1. I also favor a 94" tire.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 763
Likes: 75
Liked 524 Times in 141 Posts
|
![]()
I have always favored running as much gear as your engine can RPM. It is physics to me for moving a heavy stationary object and accelerating it through the 1/4 mile with the tongue hanging out at the end.
A 5.14 with a 94" rollout Hoosier or a 4.88 with a 92.5" Hoosier would be where I would lean. They almost work out the same. Our LT1's carry more weight than in the past and I think enough gear is key. I was running a 5.00 for a long time and would bounce between the 92.5" and 94" depending on the air. I don't run an automatic anymore so I went to a different gear. I do have a new in the box Richmond 5.00 that I need to sell. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Northern New Jersey suburbs
Posts: 2,314
Likes: 25
Liked 544 Times in 213 Posts
|
![]()
I made the gear swap from a 4.56 to a 4.88 and basically saw no ET difference.....
RPM went up 200-300 I was running A/FIA at the time and weighed around 3050lbs Engine made it's fastest runs shifting 1-2 under 7000 and 2-3 at 7000 10.50's 124-125 in good air Not killer fast but not terrible.....that was 15 years ago !!
__________________
Rich Biebel S/C 1479 Stock 147R |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#7 |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,817
Likes: 2,149
Liked 2,336 Times in 549 Posts
|
![]()
We also ran a 4.56 in the IHRA days in A/FIA and Top Stock.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 27
Likes: 1
Liked 6 Times in 5 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 763
Likes: 75
Liked 524 Times in 141 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Northern New Jersey suburbs
Posts: 2,314
Likes: 25
Liked 544 Times in 213 Posts
|
![]()
I drove the car in 2011 at 2 races and by then it weighed 3200 in B/SA
Probably had the same 4.88's in it and a better fuel map and maybe a little better engine Went 10.50's at 124-125 in real good air at Maple Grove.... Had E-shift in it then and Hoosiers..... I ran 3066 M/T's and felt like they were faster than the Hoosiers..... I did try moving the RPM up back when I owned the car but it did not run faster.... Big improvements in various engine parts and mods since then maybe make that not true anymore... A few cars around that are pretty fast considering the weight that got lumped on them since I owned one.... One of my all time favorite cars I ever owned and raced....
__________________
Rich Biebel S/C 1479 Stock 147R |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|