|
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2024
Location: S Jersey
Posts: 59
Likes: 232
Liked 47 Times in 24 Posts
|
![]()
I am wondering if the Pontiac Iron Duke 4 cylinder engine would be competitive in NHRA stock or SS class racing or is factored too high?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,481
Likes: 3,581
Liked 7,659 Times in 1,726 Posts
|
![]()
You might want to narrow that list down just a bit. There are a bunch of GM combos that use very different variations of the "Iron Duke" based on year and body style. Some are OK and some not so much.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 870
Likes: 673
Liked 962 Times in 352 Posts
|
![]()
Our fleet of Hyster and Yale forklifts at the plants had 181 cu in GM iron Dukes. Years before that they were 151 cu in GM dukes.
__________________
Jeff Niceswanger 3740 SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,481
Likes: 3,581
Liked 7,659 Times in 1,726 Posts
|
![]()
The 181 was/is an industrial and marine variation. Check out the cylinder head if you get the chance, it's very good!
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Pontiac,il.
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 275
Liked 951 Times in 190 Posts
|
![]()
The 62-69 Novas had a 4 cylinder option available. It was not called an Iron Duke.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#6 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,481
Likes: 3,581
Liked 7,659 Times in 1,726 Posts
|
![]()
That would be the granddaddy of the "Iron Duke". Yac and I have brain-farted for years about doing a 4 cylinder 62-3-4 Chevy II 100 for W stick (Yac) or auto for years!
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#7 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,412
Likes: 511
Liked 329 Times in 177 Posts
|
![]()
Bottom ends/main area of the 151 block are very weak along with the crankshafts being very spindly---heads are a problem with no flow u will have see what they allow as a stocker I would forget it as a SS it all depends on what they will let you get away with--and the carbs probably are lacking any thing to be used for performance---no support for the cam shafts only 3 bearings you need 5 to keep it from whipping around--- you will have to make or really scrounge around for any parts to make it work---if you never ran a 4 before its going to be a long learning curve to be successful-- FED 387
Last edited by FED 387; 11-08-2024 at 03:34 PM. Reason: add'l info |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#8 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2024
Location: S Jersey
Posts: 59
Likes: 232
Liked 47 Times in 24 Posts
|
![]()
Sorry for my stupidity....was looking at the 1986 151 cu in 4 cylinder.....don't understand why you are not a mind reader
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2024
Location: S Jersey
Posts: 59
Likes: 232
Liked 47 Times in 24 Posts
|
![]()
Thanks for all the feedback and input,,, saves a "bad" investment
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 19
Likes: 61
Liked 10 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|