|
![]() |
#131 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,628
Likes: 160
Liked 759 Times in 379 Posts
|
![]()
more lies and misinformation. Now for the facts...Bob's car weighed 3600 lbs.+ complete with glass hood and bumper and the weight over the front tires was 1700 lbs. compared to my 2200+.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#132 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Colorado Springs Colorado/Thousand Oaks Ca
Posts: 656
Likes: 82
Liked 372 Times in 129 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#133 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,628
Likes: 160
Liked 759 Times in 379 Posts
|
![]()
Insane...NO, informed YES!
![]() Just so happens I spoke to Bob 2 weeks ago, (the same Bob West that wants nothing to do with you and threatened you with legal action if you did not remove his car from your website) to help out a friend building a '68 chevelle stocker, specifically about his former car's nose weight and the santhuff spring he used. Last edited by 1320racer; 01-12-2014 at 10:17 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#134 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Colorado Springs Colorado/Thousand Oaks Ca
Posts: 656
Likes: 82
Liked 372 Times in 129 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#135 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,628
Likes: 160
Liked 759 Times in 379 Posts
|
![]()
again lies, but now it's damage control and again you talk about another car that the original owner sold in 2007, 7 years ago. Nonetheless, it had nothing for my car, weighed less and didn't 60 foot 1.28!
Last edited by 1320racer; 01-12-2014 at 10:34 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#136 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 645
Likes: 132
Liked 140 Times in 51 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
http://www.hrpartsandstuff.com/ Kevin Last edited by SSGN; 01-12-2014 at 10:34 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#137 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Colorado Springs Colorado/Thousand Oaks Ca
Posts: 656
Likes: 82
Liked 372 Times in 129 Posts
|
![]()
I've never seen a full timeslip with a 1.28 60 foot for your car, but you would think a aftermarket 522 at (@FAST 60 CLOCKS PIEDMONT) would certainly be able to pull that off.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#138 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,628
Likes: 160
Liked 759 Times in 379 Posts
|
![]()
Another feeble and failed attempt at misleading those following along.
![]() ![]() now it's fast clocks:rolleyes, that's what those that can't do the same say! ![]() Last edited by 1320racer; 01-12-2014 at 10:47 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#139 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Colorado Springs Colorado/Thousand Oaks Ca
Posts: 656
Likes: 82
Liked 372 Times in 129 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Again, this a valid question: how does one 131 MPH in negative 1000 feet air = 700 HP, anyone.............????????? And one more valid question: How does a car that runs 131 mph with a 1.28 60 only run 10.07? Last edited by HP HUNTER; 01-12-2014 at 10:57 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#140 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,628
Likes: 160
Liked 759 Times in 379 Posts
|
![]()
stop the lies. just because you refuse to believe it, don't mean it didn't happen, the photos, videos and time slip don't lie and are far more than you have ever posted up regarding any of your claims! it ran 10.07 @ 131 in 1400+ air! Again, no one cares and it was almost 7 years ago, let it go!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|