|
|
View Poll Results: Opinions on consolidating classes | |||
Combine Sticks and Automatics |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
33 | 14.73% |
Spread Weight Breaks (i.e., .5 for upper classes, .75 for some, then to 1.00 lb breaks) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
22 | 9.82% |
Both of the above |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
36 | 16.07% |
LEAVE IT ALONE! |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
133 | 59.38% |
Voters: 224. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#19 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,118
Likes: 1,577
Liked 1,837 Times in 417 Posts
|
![]()
Here's a very quick rough draft:
AA 7.0 to 7.99 10.6 A 8.0 to 8.99 11.0 B 9.0 to 9.99 11.5 C 10.0 to 10.99 11.8 D 11.0 to 11.99 12.2 E 12.0 to 12.99 12.4 F 13.0 to 13.99 12.8 G 14.0 to 14.99 13.1 H 15.0 to 15.99 13.4 I 16.0 to 16.99 13.6 J 17.0 to 17.99 13.9 K 18.0 to 18.99 14.2 L 19.0 to 19.99 14.6 M 20.0 to 21.99 14.9 N 22.0 to 23.99 15.4 O 24.0 to 24.99 15.9 P 25.00 and higher 16.3 Automatic indexes would be 0.05 higher. To merge the FWD cars, you'd use a weight offset to get them to a class where they're at a similar index. For example, the rule might read, " FWD cars run in a class 3.0 pounds heavier than their published factor". Instead of the wide weight breaks currently in FWD, you'd narrow them up. For example, a A/FS FWD car that factors at 13.0 would be given a 3.0 offset, to make it a 16.0 factor. That would make it an I car with a 13.6 index, dropping their index 0.25 (almost all the indexes for the consolidated classes stay the same or get lower). You could either continue to run stick and auto together with a weight break, or separate them. Counting separate classes for stick and automatic, you'd only have 32 classes, as opposed to the current number of around 45-50.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S Last edited by Alan Roehrich; 11-24-2010 at 06:49 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|