|
![]() |
#15 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,494
Likes: 3,595
Liked 7,726 Times in 1,739 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
77-78 231 I like enough that I have one done in the garage waiting for a Monza or Sunbird. 78 must use a 1.09 venturi carb but NHRA has the 77 all "whored" up again and can use a big carb. 79 to me just doesn't look worth the 10 HP hit. 80 196, check out Monza 78-79 with this engine (blue light special!). 229 can still fly and can be reasonably done. The 200 is the brute here but can only make V and only in a Malibu at 2810 lbs ( big boned drivers need not apply!). 4.3 has #1 qualifier potential but it might push our budget. My V6 catch of the day? 82 Pontiac Grand Prix 4V 252/170 the only car in the guide with this motor that's not a Buick and the specs are "different"! In a Buick this has been factored and defactored over the years and it's still good and it has (in 84) a big Q-jet and a .411/.411 cam. The Pontiac has a small Q-jet and a .357/.366 cam which sound like a bad thing but being a "different" combo than the Buick I believe that a well placed letter to NHRA would get this combo back some HP. The original factor was 165 HP and it was unfairly hit by a Buick which is a different combo. It seems only fair to put it back to at the most 165. This one just screams "YAC" to me.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|