Mikronite

Dwight Southerland · 03-23-2012, 09:04 AM

Car Craft magazine reported a back to back test in 2009 with a 8.8 Ford rear end in a mostly-stock Mustang with 204 hp at the rear wheels to start. A-B test showed a 6 hp increase. They didn't do the A-B-A (not sure how you could do an actual A-B-A test with the same set of gears), and they used a new set of gears for the treatment. I don't get super excited about that for several reasons that could call into question the nit-picky, undeniable scientific precision of thiws test, but this example with other tests that have been documented show there is enough evidence to indicate it would be worth investigating. Certainly enough to not make such a big deal about Jim Bailey's claims.

I fully understand why Jim is not responding to 1320racer's rants and support him fully. As with any part or service, the vendor has no control over the application or installation. Some people can screw up a bowling ball with a feather. That is not to imply that 1320racer is one of those people, but you never know. This situation is a great example of character. If 1320racer does not believe that Jim's services will help him, then he has the perogative to not buy the service. Anything further than that just shows a lack of character and consideration. I personally have heard unsolicited testimony from several sources that support Jim's claims, so that becomes evidence for me to consider his service. Also, I have experienced positive results from processes that are similar to but not as sophisticated as the extent that Mikronite does and that is also evidence that Jim's service is meritable.

http://www.carcraft.com/techfaq/116_...t/viewall.html

I also agree that it would be good to post your name when making adversarial comments. Anything less is cowardly.

03-23-2012, 09:04 AM	#17
Dwight Southerland VIP Member Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything. Posts: 2,002 Likes: 64 Liked 783 Times in 195 Posts	Re: Mikronite Car Craft magazine reported a back to back test in 2009 with a 8.8 Ford rear end in a mostly-stock Mustang with 204 hp at the rear wheels to start. A-B test showed a 6 hp increase. They didn't do the A-B-A (not sure how you could do an actual A-B-A test with the same set of gears), and they used a new set of gears for the treatment. I don't get super excited about that for several reasons that could call into question the nit-picky, undeniable scientific precision of thiws test, but this example with other tests that have been documented show there is enough evidence to indicate it would be worth investigating. Certainly enough to not make such a big deal about Jim Bailey's claims. I fully understand why Jim is not responding to 1320racer's rants and support him fully. As with any part or service, the vendor has no control over the application or installation. Some people can screw up a bowling ball with a feather. That is not to imply that 1320racer is one of those people, but you never know. This situation is a great example of character. If 1320racer does not believe that Jim's services will help him, then he has the perogative to not buy the service. Anything further than that just shows a lack of character and consideration. I personally have heard unsolicited testimony from several sources that support Jim's claims, so that becomes evidence for me to consider his service. Also, I have experienced positive results from processes that are similar to but not as sophisticated as the extent that Mikronite does and that is also evidence that Jim's service is meritable. http://www.carcraft.com/techfaq/116_...t/viewall.html I also agree that it would be good to post your name when making adversarial comments. Anything less is cowardly.