wrong spec submitted by MOPAR

Irv Johns · 05-02-2012, 09:11 PM

[QUOTE=Alan Roehrich;324543]Irv, are you saying NHRA allowed you to race a car with an engine that did not have clearly defined specifications in the blueprint guide?

How did they expect to properly inspect an engine at tear down if there was no published specification, or even an accepted part number?

The blame for that lays solely at the feet of NHRA.[/QUOTE

Not exactly , we didn't find that out till today there were no specs on Diamond pistons in the 392 until March
all the other specs were posted,
ie: bore, stroke , valve size, cam, deck, head gasket thickness, throttle body size.rockers .

05-02-2012, 09:11 PM	#24
Irv Johns Member Join Date: Nov 2004 Posts: 178 Likes: 1 Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts	Re: wrong spec submitted by MOPAR [QUOTE=Alan Roehrich;324543]Irv, are you saying NHRA allowed you to race a car with an engine that did not have clearly defined specifications in the blueprint guide? How did they expect to properly inspect an engine at tear down if there was no published specification, or even an accepted part number? The blame for that lays solely at the feet of NHRA.[/QUOTE Not exactly , we didn't find that out till today there were no specs on Diamond pistons in the 392 until March all the other specs were posted, ie: bore, stroke , valve size, cam, deck, head gasket thickness, throttle body size.rockers .