|
![]() |
#11 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 3,047
Likes: 712
Liked 1,606 Times in 584 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Drag starts to have a noticeable effect at 10 MPH and downforce, depending on the frontal shape of the car, as early as 40 MPH. This is not taking into consideration the rake of the body as it accelerates down the track. Like the adage says, looks can be deceiving. Although a car may look or appear to be fast just by its looks, it does not mean it is aerodynamically efficient. The 1998 thru 2002 Camaro are one of the most aerodynamic cars ever built. Below are the body specs: Wheelbase 101.1 60.7 60.6 193.5 74.1 51.2 4.5 .34 Below are the body specs for the Corvette: Wheelbase 104.6 61.9 62 179.8 73.6 47.7 4.0 .32 The Camaro has a shorter wheelbase and narrower body than the Corvette. The Corvette has a lower roof height and shorter length than the Camaro. The difference in both cars drag coefficient is only .02 which in the case of a drag car, is technically irrelevant. So in a nutshell, the Corvette does not have an advantage over the Camaro as regards to body size or aerodynamics. As a matter of fact, I believe that more detailed analysis will show the longer body and rear shape of the Camaro is an advantage at higher speeds and weight transfer when compared to the blunt, short rear of the Corvette. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|