HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 11-30-2022, 04:50 PM   #30
GUMP
VIP Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,824
Likes: 2,175
Liked 2,355 Times in 554 Posts
Default Re: thin ring grooves

Quote:
Originally Posted by mnmaxwedge View Post
There is really no argument to win.
I agree.


Quote:
The expense argument is laughable, if you're concerned with expense you should probably be bracket racing.
I have a budget like everyone else. I like to see ROI in my program. If the rules allow it, and it goes faster for less money, that's what I'm spending my money on.

That said, I will remind you that the OP's argument for going to a new piston rule is cost.


Quote:
I doubt that the things we are talking about will have any effect on what's happening.
You would be surprised who reads these threads...


Quote:
Thanks for the verbal jousting, I enjoyed it...
Here too. As much as I like racing new combinations, I think you will find that I am one of the biggest advocates for keeping the older combinations in class racing.

Take Care,

Daren
__________________
Daren Poole-Adams
NHRA Stock/SS 2007
GUMP is online now   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.