|
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: What would you do if the NHRA banned timers in .90 (Super) class racing? | |||
| I'd like it and keep racing the current .90 classes. My car isn't high mph anyway. |
   
|
34 | 47.89% |
| I'd like it and keep racing the current .90 classes. I'd sell my 632" and pay off my mortgage. |
  
|
1 | 1.41% |
| I'd grudgingly accept it and race my 160 mph S/ST car in S/C. |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| Do you know how much I spent on this dry sump 632? I'm going Top Sportsman racing! |
  
|
4 | 5.63% |
| I'd hunt down the bastard who proposed it and beat him with the dry sump off of my spare 632. |
  
|
32 | 45.07% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 71. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-17-2008, 04:37 PM
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: NY Snowbelt
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: What would you do if the NHRA banned timers in .90 (Super) class racing?
I can't stay out of this anymore. I run a dragster that runs under 160mph. It's called a racer on a budget! We're out there and don't mind being chased! We are competitive! Bring on those 190mph dragsters! Drop changing the classes and start arguing about payouts and entry fees!
If you feel you can't be competitive in your current class because it's too expensive or whatever, maybe think about sticking to bracket racing or arm chair racing. Whatever fits. By the way, my slow dragster breaks less than alot of the fast ones! LOL
__________________
Michele Corigliano |
|
|
|
Threaded Mode