|
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: What would you do if the NHRA banned timers in .90 (Super) class racing? | |||
| I'd like it and keep racing the current .90 classes. My car isn't high mph anyway. |
   
|
34 | 47.89% |
| I'd like it and keep racing the current .90 classes. I'd sell my 632" and pay off my mortgage. |
  
|
1 | 1.41% |
| I'd grudgingly accept it and race my 160 mph S/ST car in S/C. |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| Do you know how much I spent on this dry sump 632? I'm going Top Sportsman racing! |
  
|
4 | 5.63% |
| I'd hunt down the bastard who proposed it and beat him with the dry sump off of my spare 632. |
  
|
32 | 45.07% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 71. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-17-2008, 10:40 AM
|
#10 |
|
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Commerce, Mi
Posts: 1,387
Likes: 1
Liked 4 Times in 2 Posts
|
Re: What would you do if the NHRA banned timers in .90 (Super) class racing?
everybody has their opinion on things.....but what is the issue with the timer.....is it because they make guys that really don't have a chance to win competitive.....or is it because it allows guys that can afford some horsepower to go faster than they do....what is the issue...it looks to me like the guys that don't like them are the guys not racing much (outside of Bill Jackson...and he's old school and would be competitive either way)...and somehow the outlawing of timers would allow them to race...
why are we talking about this...go race NMRA or NMCA and race the 10 cars for the title.... CBS almost Jason like |
|
|
|
Threaded Mode